|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2012-01-03 04:27 (5274 d 05:55 ago) Posting: # 7854 Views: 13,804 |
|
|
Hi to all copypasters! I have mislaid the Apr 2010 draft, but in the current Feb 2011 version five lines of SAS code are missing. Well, not really missing, but printed in white on a white background. Here is the entire stuff in all its beauty (missing lines in red): Example SAS Codes: partial reference-replicated 3-way design Dataset containing TEST observations: data test;Dataset containing REFERENCE 1 observations: data ref1;Dataset containing REFERENCE 2 observations: data ref2;Determine Iij and Dij data scavbe;Intermediate analysis - ilat proc glm data=scavbe;IGLM2: pointest=exp(estimate);Intermediate analysis - dlat proc glm data=scavbe;DGLM1: dfd=df;From the above parameters, calculate the final 95% upper confidence bound: theta=((log(1.25))/0.25)**2;Example SAS Codes: fully replicated 4-way design Dataset containing TEST 1 observations: data test1;Dataset containing TEST 2 observations: data test2;Dataset containing REFERENCE 1 observations: data ref1;Dataset containing REFERENCE 2 observations: data ref2;Determine Iij and Dij data scavbe;Intermediate analysis - ilat proc mixed data=scavbe;IOUT2: pointest=exp(estimate);Intermediate analysis - dlat proc mixed data=scavbe;DOUT1: s2wr=estimate/2;DOUT2: dfd=df;From the above parameters, calculate the final 95% upper confidence bound: theta=((log(1.25))/0.25)**2;Calculation of unscaled 90% bioequivalence confidence intervals: PROC MIXEDdata unsc1;Enjoy! — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |
|
jag009 ★★★ NJ, 2013-01-14 20:47 (4896 d 13:36 ago) @ Helmut Posting: # 9837 Views: 8,689 |
|
|
Hi Helmut, I was just checking the 4-way full rep code. You wrote: ❝ From the above parameters, calculate the final 95% upper confidence bound: ❝ From the progesterone FDA guidance Dec 2012. I see different equation for theta: theta=((log(1.11111))/0.1)**2;Yours is wrong? Thanks John |
|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2013-01-14 22:40 (4896 d 11:43 ago) @ jag009 Posting: # 9839 Views: 8,893 |
|
|
Hi John, ❝ ❝ From the above parameters, calculate the final 95% upper confidence bound: ❝ ❝ ❝ ❝ From the progesterone FDA guidance Dec 2012. I see different equation for theta: ❝ ❝ ❝ ❝ Yours is wrong? Nope. Maybe you had the warfarin-guidance also open in your reader. ![]() Yours would mean downscaling. In the Dec 2012 revision FDA corrected only the ‘visibility’ (missing lines which were formatted in white on a white background). The formula I gave is still the same (upscaling) like in previous versions. See p.6 for the partial replicate and p.8 for the full replicate. — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |

![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)

