Sree
☆    

2009-08-07 20:38
(5795 d 10:00 ago)

Posting: # 4014
Views: 10,201
 

 PK & Stat analysis of BA/BE data in MS-Excel [Software]

Hi Guys,

Can anybody tell me how to do PK & Stat analysis of BA/BE in MS-Excel? Whether is it really possible to calculate all the parameters in Excel sheet?
PL suggest me any reference to the calculations?


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2009-08-07 21:04
(5795 d 09:35 ago)

@ Sree
Posting: # 4017
Views: 8,711
 

 PK & Stat analysis of BA/BE data in MS-Excel

Hi Sree,

A good place to start is the book by Chow and Liu "Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies".
It describes a way of doing the BE-ANOVA without model fitting, and it also -and this is where I think you easily could gets started with Excel- tells how to derive the statistics without ANOVA, but using t-test in stead.
As it happens, the two methods should ideally give the same results ( in terms of p-values), but they do not in case of imbalance, where the t-test approach gives you p-values that correspond to ANOVA based on model fits with type III sums of squares and they are generally accepted.
All in all, it is a jungle out there. In order to calculate your BE-statistics for a standard 2,2,2-BE study you can thus use a linear model* and play with factor inclusion to obtain the ANOVA (with for example type III SS), or you can do the ANOVA without a model fit by way of the reference above, or you can do it all without ANOVA and just do a series of t-tests (and get p-values corresponding to type III SS).

Best regards
EM.


*: You can even use a (linear) mixed model with subjects as random factor.
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2009-08-07 21:18
(5795 d 09:20 ago)

@ Sree
Posting: # 4018
Views: 8,966
 

 M$-Excel :-(

Dear Sree,

welcome to the forum!

❝ Can anybody tell me how to do PK & Stat analysis of BA/BE in MS-Excel? Whether is it really possible to calculate all the parameters in Excel sheet?[image]


Yes it is possible – if you are talking about noncompartmental analysis (NCA) only, and keep the BE design simple (parallel groups, 2×2 cross-over). You have to be quite experienced to deal with higher-order cross-overs. Don’t even think about evaluating a replicate design study.

Now for the bad part – IMHO it is practically impossible to validate an NCA/BE-analysis in Excel. OK, you can do  everything  something in Excel – but only for fun (actually I have workbooks for all these types of studies: at the right is an example as quoted by ElMaestro in his post); don’t think about using it in a regulated environment (IMHO, you will not survive the inspection).

In the future please search before posting.
You would have found a couple of posts flashing a bright warning, e.g.,If you are short in money, why don’t you consider the package bear for [image]? The current version supports NCA for single/multiple dose, and BE for parallel, 2×2 cross-over, and replicate designs.
Resources (freeware under the GNU-license): [image] (current v2.9.1 2009-06-26), bear (current v2.4.0 2009-07-21).

Remember that you have to validate all software - this requirement is applicable to commercial software as well.
:PCchaos: I hope you do not want to perform compartmental PK in Excel - I would consider it simply impossible (Excel’s solver is just a piece of s…t).
There’s an add-on (PK Solutions) marketed by SummitPK. But keeping the well-documented deficiencies of Excel in mind… :confused:

❝ PL suggest me any reference to the calculations?


What do you mean by that? I would suggest reading some books. A selection is given here.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
49 visitors (0 registered, 49 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5