Dafni_C
☆    

Cyprus,
2024-01-17 11:00
(236 d 22:03 ago)

Posting: # 23829
Views: 1,863
 

 Subject effect justification [General Sta­tis­tics]

We have performed a bioequivalence study which passed the acceptance criteria. However there is a subject (sequence) effect for for ln-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞. How this can be justified that doesn't affect the study results?:confused::confused:
Relaxation
★    

Germany,
2024-01-17 13:30
(236 d 19:33 ago)

@ Dafni_C
Posting: # 23831
Views: 1,504
 

 Subject effect justification

Dear Dafni_C.

Just for clarification of the background.
You conducted an ANOVA (or mixed effects model) with the effects "treatment", "sequence" and "period" as well as the effect "subject(sequence)"?
And in your "ANOVA"-table the p-value of "subject(sequence)" was found to be statistically significant?

There are more qualified persons here, but ...
this indicates that the subjects in the trial were different people, so that normally would be expected to be "significant", right?

If you mean the "sequence" effect or something else, you may find the information available in the "Articles" (see header at the very top) helpful.

Best regards!
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,222 posts in 4,877 threads, 1,656 registered users;
32 visitors (1 registered, 31 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Explanations exist; they have existed for all time;
there is always an easy solution to every human problem –
neat, plausible and wrong.    H. L. Mencken

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5