Bebac user
☆    

Egypt,
2023-09-09 08:34
(17 d 22:16 ago)

Posting: # 23713
Views: 297
 

 Amlodipine/Valsartan [Design Issues]

The combination of Amlodipine and valsartan was published as two periods crossover but after checking the variability of Valsartan, it had more than 30%. Therefore, should I in those cases design this study as replicated or un-replicated ?
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2023-09-12 08:48
(14 d 22:02 ago)

@ Bebac user
Posting: # 23717
Views: 207
 

 Amlodipine/Valsartan

Hi Bebac user,

❝ The combination of Amlodipine and valsartan was published as two periods crossover but after checking the variability of Valsartan, it had more than 30%. Therefore, should I in those cases design this study as replicated or un-replicated?


There is no product-specific guidance of the EMA and the FDA recommends 2×2×2 crossovers (fasting and fed). Any replicated design can be assessed for (conventional, unscaled) average bioequivalence. However, if you aim at reference-scaling, I would be wary to base the sample size on the CVw of a 2×2×2 design because the CVwR is unknown (see this article).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,761 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
10 visitors (0 registered, 10 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5