ceylan
☆    

Turkey,
2021-11-19 16:46
(887 d 07:35 ago)

Posting: # 22676
Views: 1,708
 

 Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Hi,

For PK bioequivalence, 90% confidence interval is ok both for US and EMA.

For PD bioequivalence, I want to ask about the confidence interval for US and EMA?
Is it 90% CI for US and 95% CI for EMA?

And in what circumstances, 90 % CI and / or 95 % CI are being used?

Thank you,

Best Regards,

Ceylan
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2021-11-19 17:22
(887 d 06:59 ago)

@ ceylan
Posting: # 22677
Views: 1,471
 

 Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence

Hi ceylan,

❝ For PK bioequivalence, 90% confidence interval is ok both for US and EMA.


❝ For PD bioequivalence, I want to ask about the confidence interval for US and EMA?

❝ Is it 90% CI for US and 95% CI for EMA?


❝ And in what circumstances, 90 % CI and / or 95 % CI are being used?


I think the question is a little too general.
Sometimes regulators want a 95% CI other times they want a 90% CI.
Here's a case of a 95% CI being used.
Here's a case of 90% CI being used.

Whatever you do, if you need PD I recommend to go for a scientific advice. Ask about 90% vs 95% if there is nothing written in a guideline. Don't make assumptions and don't take chances.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
ceylan
☆    

Turkey,
2021-11-21 00:14
(886 d 00:07 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 22678
Views: 1,418
 

 Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence

Hi ElMaestro,

Thank you for your help.
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
83 visitors (0 registered, 83 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5