ceylan
☆    

Turkey,
2021-11-19 15:46
(18 d 04:14 ago)

Posting: # 22676
Views: 349
 

 Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Hi,

For PK bioequivalence, 90% confidence interval is ok both for US and EMA.

For PD bioequivalence, I want to ask about the confidence interval for US and EMA?
Is it 90% CI for US and 95% CI for EMA?

And in what circumstances, 90 % CI and / or 95 % CI are being used?

Thank you,

Best Regards,

Ceylan
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2021-11-19 16:22
(18 d 03:38 ago)

@ ceylan
Posting: # 22677
Views: 305
 

 Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence

Hi ceylan,

» For PK bioequivalence, 90% confidence interval is ok both for US and EMA.
»
» For PD bioequivalence, I want to ask about the confidence interval for US and EMA?
» Is it 90% CI for US and 95% CI for EMA?
»
» And in what circumstances, 90 % CI and / or 95 % CI are being used?

I think the question is a little too general.
Sometimes regulators want a 95% CI other times they want a 90% CI.
Here's a case of a 95% CI being used.
Here's a case of 90% CI being used.

Whatever you do, if you need PD I recommend to go for a scientific advice. Ask about 90% vs 95% if there is nothing written in a guideline. Don't make assumptions and don't take chances.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
ceylan
☆    

Turkey,
2021-11-20 23:14
(16 d 20:46 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 22678
Views: 267
 

 Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence

Hi ElMaestro,

Thank you for your help.
Activity
 Admin contact
21,788 posts in 4,557 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 20:00 CET (Europe/Vienna)

A big computer, a complex algorithm and a long time
does not equal science.    Robert Gentleman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5