yogeshla
☆    

India,
2021-01-05 07:01
(291 d 01:11 ago)

Posting: # 22173
Views: 1,092
 

 95% upper bound limit as per FDA for fully replicate crossover BE study [RSABE / ABEL]

Hi All,

Can anyone confirm, till what decimal is acceptable for 95% upper bound limit as per FDA criteria?
Suppose 95% UB result is 0.001, is it acceptable to FDA?

Criteria is less than or equal to zero.


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]
dshah
★    

India/ United Kingdom,
2021-01-05 08:06
(291 d 00:06 ago)

@ yogeshla
Posting: # 22174
Views: 935
 

 95% upper bound limit as per FDA for fully replicate crossover BE study

Hi Yogeshla!

» Suppose 95% UB result is 0.001, is it acceptable to FDA?

The 95% UB would not be acceptable for 0.001.

Regards,
dshah
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2021-01-05 11:01
(290 d 21:10 ago)

@ dshah
Posting: # 22177
Views: 869
 

 0.001 > 0

Hi dshah and Yogeshla,

» The 95% UB would not be acceptable for 0.001.

Correct.

@Yogeshla: For the background see this post.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
yogeshla
☆    

India,
2021-01-05 12:33
(290 d 19:39 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 22178
Views: 875
 

 0.001 > 0

Thanx !!


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]
Activity
 Admin contact
21,753 posts in 4,548 threads, 1,544 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 09:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5