nuka2020
☆    

United Arab Emirates,
2020-11-19 12:09
(1336 d 13:41 ago)

Posting: # 22067
Views: 2,611
 

 highly variable drugs-Cmax [Regulatives / Guidelines]

According to the GCC guidelines a wider range of Cmax(i.e 75-133%) can be acceptable for HVDP, where it has been demonstrated that the within- subject variability for Cmax of the reference compound in the study is >30%.
But, i have a study which was performed as per Eu guidelines and accordingly, the acceptance criteria for Cmax can be widened to a maximum of 69.84 – 143.19%. Accordingly, the results of Cmax is: 70.46%-141.90%
Need suggestion whether this studies can be acceptable as per GCC guidelines?? :confused::confused:
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2020-11-19 13:05
(1336 d 12:45 ago)

@ nuka2020
Posting: # 22068
Views: 2,242
 

 GCC: HV Cmax (fixed limits)

Hi nuka2020,

❝ According to the GCC guidelines a wider range of Cmax(i.e 75-133%) can be acceptable for HVDP, where it has been demonstrated that the within- subject variability for Cmax of the reference compound in the study is >30%.

❝ … the results of Cmax is: 70.46%-141.90%

❝ Need suggestion whether this studies can be acceptable as per GCC guidelines??


What do you think?
Though you have practically a perfect PE (99.99%) you failed to show BE by far. For the GCC your study was just underpowered.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
wienui
★    

Germany/Oman,
2020-11-19 19:04
(1336 d 06:46 ago)

(edited by wienui on 2020-11-20 07:13)
@ nuka2020
Posting: # 22069
Views: 2,271
 

 highly variable drugs-Cmax

Hi nuka & Helmut,

❝ According to the GCC guidelines a wider range of Cmax(i.e 75-133%) can be acceptable for HVDP, where it has been demonstrated that the within- subject variability for Cmax of the reference compound in the study is >30%.

❝ But, i have a study which was performed as per Eu guidelines and accordingly, the acceptance criteria for Cmax can be widened to a maximum of 69.84 – 143.19%. Accordingly, the results of Cmax is: 70.46%-141.90%

❝ Need suggestion whether this studies can be acceptable as per GCC guidelines?? :confused::confused:


Unfortunately, we come back again to this point. Although the GCC GL is adopted from the EMA GL,
but the upper cap of scaling is about only 39% and not 50%!!!!
At the moment, I think you could have a good chance under the conditions that your BE study is demonstrated in a replicate design and that the high within-subject variability for Cmax not caused by outliers.

Cheers,
Osama
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2020-11-19 21:58
(1336 d 03:52 ago)

@ wienui
Posting: # 22070
Views: 2,293
 

 highly variable drugs-Cmax

Hi Osama,

❝ Although the GCC GL is adopted from the EMA GL, but the upper cap of scaling is about only 39% and not 50%!!!!


library(PowerTOST)
noquote(sprintf("%.2f%%", 100*U2CVwR(U = 1/0.75)))
[1] 39.25%

:-D

I wouldn’t call that scaling. The GL calls for fixed limits of 75.00–133.33% (based on a “clinically not relevant Δ” of 25%) for any CVwR >30% (there is no upper cap and the widened limits are fixed).
That’s the approach mentioned in the EMA’s Q&A-document of July 2006:

[image]

BTW, with fixed limits there are no issues with inflation of the type I error* like in all reference-scaling methods (EMA, Health Canada, FDA). When discussing the EMA’s draft, sponsors complained that ABEL is more restrictive at CVwR 30–39.25% than the “old” approach…

❝ At the moment, I think you could have a good chance under the conditions that your BE study is demonstrated in a replicate design and that the high within-subject variability for Cmax not caused by outliers.


That’s interesting!



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,107 posts in 4,858 threads, 1,644 registered users;
67 visitors (0 registered, 67 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

All paid jobs absorb and degrade the mind.    Aristotle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5