mittyri ★★ Russia, 2020-09-27 20:25 (1698 d 21:13 ago) Posting: # 21943 Views: 3,740 |
|
Dear All, some time ago I discovered the difference between PHX and 'PK' package in R regarding lambda_z calculation for sparse dataset analysis. My question is which one looks more reasonable for you - PHX gets means of concs and then logtransforms it to prepare for regression analysis - PK gets logs and then calculates means for that logs to prepare for regression analysis what do you think? — Kind regards, Mittyri |
martin ★★ Austria, 2020-09-28 10:40 (1698 d 06:58 ago) @ mittyri Posting: # 21945 Views: 2,933 |
|
Dear mittyri, The methods implemented in the R package PK are based on methods published in peer reviewed journals such as Non-compartmental estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters in serial sampling designs or here Non-compartmental estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters for flexible sampling designs based on log-transformation of individual values to estimate lambda_z. The rationale for log-transforming the indivdual values is that based on this approach the variance-covariance matrix can account for values both used for derving the AUC0-t as well lambda_z used to estimate the AUC from t to infinity. I am not aware of a publication which justifies calculation of lambda_z in case of sparse sampling based on means only as implemented in PHX. In addition, attention should be paid to handling to values <LLOQ where you may find this paper of interest Methods for Non-Compartmental Pharmacokinetic Analysis With Observations Below the Limit of Quantification. best regards & hope this helps martin PS.: I would like to use the opportunity to illustrate how important adequate handling of BLQ values are by using a theoretical example. Consider a serial sampling design (N=5 animals per time point) where all but one value is BLQ at the last time point and think about estimation of t1/2. Ignoring BLQ values at the last time point for 4 out of 5 animals will lead to a overestimated population t1/2 as the last time point is just driven by a single animal. The same is when you set BLQ values to zero as estimation of t1/2 requires some log-transformation and log of 0 is not defined and is therefore equivalent to omitting those BLQ values. |
mittyri ★★ Russia, 2020-10-06 14:31 (1690 d 03:07 ago) @ martin Posting: # 21972 Views: 2,849 |
|
Dear Martin, I appreciate all the work was done for sparse analysis by you and your colleagues. I just have 2 suggestions regarding PK package: - is it possible to estimate lambda_z, not providing n.tail argument? - is it possible to specify for the group argument of 'eqv()' function what which one is the test and which one is the reference? — Kind regards, Mittyri |