kumarnaidu ★ Mumbai, India, 2019-02-05 16:32 (2248 d 10:19 ago) Posting: # 19869 Views: 2,508 |
|
Hi, We have questions on In-vitro Population BE study. The approach used was the proc GLM for calculation MSW_R, MSW_T, MSB_R and MSB_R for parameters of D50 and Span to population bioequivalence. We use standard algorithm for one life stage (m=1) as defined in draft budesonide guideline recommend sept 2012. Now problem is our results does not matches with the sponsor results, when we calculated SD_R and SD_T for one life stage (m=1) from Proc GLM model. There are large differences for the values of SD_R, SD_T and 95% upper confidence bound for linearized criteria of reference-scaled and constant scaled my approach, but the Geometric mean are very similar for both D50 and Span. They have used the proc mean procedure and directly extracted SD_T and SD_R value and used all remaining calculation. As mentioned in draft budesonide guideline, for data collected on one life stage (m=1), ignore E2, E4c and E4s and their corresponding H and U terms in the calculation. Calculation formula for sigmaR and sigmaT (for more than one life stage (m>1)) are as below: data FinalRef; We did not found the algorithm with sigmaR and sigmaT calculation for one life stage (m=1). We have slightly modified SD_R and SD_T formula for one life stage (m=1) and remove (((m_R-1)*MSW_R)/m_R)) and (((m_T-1)*MSW_T)/m_T)) from above equation. Modified equation are as below: SD_R=sqrt (MSB_R/m_R) Here we are confuse with approach which is based on the draft guideline. Can anybody comment of formula on SD_R and SD_T calculation for one life stage (m=1)? https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/.../Guidances/UCM319977.pdf — Kumar Naidu |