(1907 d 05:09 ago)
Posting: # 19269
A subject had vomited within the 2 times of tmax period, as per pk person discussion, he continued and completed the study. After bioanalysis of the sample again pk persons, taking decision to withdraw a subject. does this procedure is fine? kindly explain the same.
Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. Please follow the Forum’s Policy. [Helmut]
(1907 d 02:52 ago)
Posting: # 19272
❝ A subject had vomited within the 2 times of tmax period, as per pk person discussion, he continued and completed the study.
Always nice to have a discussion but what did the protocol state?
❝ After bioanalysis of the sample again pk persons, taking decision to withdraw a subject. does this procedure is fine?
No, it doesn’t look fine at all – even if the protocol would have stated sumfink like
“if a subject vomited within 2times median tmax of the reference product he will be excluded from comparative assessments based on the judgment of the pharmacokineticists”.Not a good idea. It would be unacceptable after calculating the PE and CI – smells fishy / cherry-picking. Still doubtful if done before by “eye-ball PK” (i.e., looking at the profiles).
You had two discussions. In the first one the pharmacokineticists concluded that vomiting would not matter. In the second one he revised his opinion. Now what?
Maybe you are interested in this recent guidance of the FDA. Under major BE deficiencies you will find:
In principle any reason for exclusion is valid provided it is specified in the protocol and the decision to exclude is made before bioanalysis.
I suggest that you perform two analyses:
Next time state the reasons for exclusion – before bioanalysis – in the protocol as suggested by the EMA.
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮