Posting: # 18904
when I use data from offcial Phoenix support forum, I can't get the same results from winnonlin and nonmem. Is there any difference in algorithm in two softwares? Or does it exist some mistakes in code?
Edit: Please don’t shout! [Helmut]
Posting: # 18907
» I can't get the same results from winnonlin and nonmem.
Well, we are dealing with nonlinear mixed effects models with all the bells and whistles. The software tries to find the optimum in an n+1 dimensional parameter-space. NONMEM and Phoenix/NLME employ maximum likelihood, whereas WinNonlin least squares. See this post for details and the presentation given at the PAGE meeting 2005 about comparing PopPK software in a blinded manner. Also interesting: Bauer et al.1, Colby and Bair2. The latter deals with Phoenix.
» Is there any difference in algorithm in two softwares?
Well, in both there are more than one. It would be very difficult to get exactly the same results even if you use the same algorithm, initial estimates, parameter constraints, convergence criteria, max. number of iterations,
We can only hope that an algo converges to the global – and not a local – optimum.
That’s the reason why in BE only NCA is acceptable.
» Or does it exist some mistakes in code?
Always possible (see this presentation). The software industry generally considers one defect / 2,000 lines of code ‘stable’. Oh dear! Package
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼