Ramesh Ramalingam ☆ India, 2017-09-05 09:35 (2756 d 18:59 ago) Posting: # 17776 Views: 8,169 |
|
Dear All, I have more doubt on subject inclusion criteria for pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis in fully replicate (Including NTI drugs) and partial replicate design BE studies. could you please suggest the subject inclusion criteria for PK and stat analysis (including who's data can be considered for BE)? Also, How many treatment periods subject should be completed in the study? Regards, Ramesh Ramalingam |
ElMaestro ★★★ Denmark, 2017-09-05 10:26 (2756 d 18:08 ago) @ Ramesh Ramalingam Posting: # 17777 Views: 7,328 |
|
Hi Ramesh, Statistics: EU: Include those who provide both a Test and Reference period. US: Include those who provide data. Descriptive PK: Done on all data as much as possible. I have a feeling you may have asked about something else, though? — Pass or fail! ElMaestro |
Ramesh Ramalingam ☆ India, 2017-09-05 11:17 (2756 d 17:16 ago) @ ElMaestro Posting: # 17778 Views: 7,456 |
|
Dear ElMaestro, Thank you very much for your response. Based on your response i understand that the subject inclusion criteria for pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis as follows for NTI drugs: SWR calculations & SWT calculations & Average BE: subject should completed all the study periods SWR calculations & Average BE:subject who completed with Reference twice and Test once SWT calculations & Average BE:subject who completed with Reference once and Test twice SWR calculations:subject who completed with Reference twice SWT calculations:subject who completed with Test twice Based on this subject should complete at least two treatment periods of the study wright? for HVDs(fully replicate design): SWR calculations & Average BE: subject who completed all the study periods SWR calculations:subject who completed with Reference twice Average BE:Subject who complete at least one test and one reference treatment Hence, Subject should complete at least one test and one reference treatment period or both reference treatment periods of the study, wright? Kindly advice if anything wrong. Regards, Ramesh Ramalingam Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Ohlbe] |
ElMaestro ★★★ Denmark, 2017-09-05 11:20 (2756 d 17:13 ago) @ Ramesh Ramalingam Posting: # 17779 Views: 7,230 |
|
Hi Ramesh, please be specific: are you targeting US or EU or some other territory? — Pass or fail! ElMaestro |
Ramesh Ramalingam ☆ India, 2017-09-05 11:22 (2756 d 17:12 ago) @ ElMaestro Posting: # 17780 Views: 7,201 |
|
❝ please be specific: are you targeting US or EU or some other territory? US |
ElMaestro ★★★ Denmark, 2017-09-05 12:16 (2756 d 16:17 ago) @ Ramesh Ramalingam Posting: # 17781 Views: 7,207 |
|
Hi Ramesh, ❝ US Then all variance components come from a mixed model that has been fit using REML. Any subject who has an R or T value or any quantity of both contributes (let's leave 'outliers' and aberrant values out for the purpose of this discussion). — Pass or fail! ElMaestro |
yicaoting ★ NanKing, China, 2017-09-05 17:23 (2756 d 11:11 ago) @ Ramesh Ramalingam Posting: # 17782 Views: 7,194 |
|
❝ SWR calculations:subject who completed with Reference twice ❝ SWT calculations:subject who completed with Test twice For NTID, if you apply the formula to calc sWR or sWT, you MUST have at least twice R or twice T. Those subjects with only one R, will have no contribution in calculating sWR. Similar to that of sWT. This is just for sWR and sWT, and sWR/sWT and it's %CI. |