lizhao ☆ US, 2016-02-17 20:01 (3260 d 10:56 ago) Posting: # 16003 Views: 10,455 |
|
Dear all, For clinical endpoints, I suppose the log-normal distribution doesn't hold, therefore I should use un-transformed data to construct the 90% confidence interval? Then it would be the confidence interval of mean Test/Reference ratio? Am I correct? But then, would the acceptance limits become 80% to 120% instead? If somebody could help me out, it would be greatly appreaciated!! Thanks! |
jag009 ★★★ NJ, 2016-02-17 21:43 (3260 d 09:14 ago) @ lizhao Posting: # 16004 Views: 8,932 |
|
Hi, This might help as to why it's 80-120%. https://web.archive.org/web/20150301175741/http://learnpkpd.com/2011/01/24/where-did-the-80-125-bioequivalence-criteria-come-from/ John |
mittyri ★★ Russia, 2016-02-17 23:34 (3260 d 07:23 ago) @ lizhao Posting: # 16005 Views: 8,977 |
|
Hi lizhao, Some example from the ordinary guidance: ❝ For clinical endpoints, I suppose the log-normal distribution doesn't hold, therefore I should use un-transformed data to construct the 90% confidence interval? Then it would be the confidence interval of mean Test/Reference ratio? Am I correct? It could be the difference or the ratio. It is common practice to suppose normal distribution of clinical endpoints. BTW be aware, are you sure that your clinical endpoint is distributed normally? ❝ But then, would the acceptance limits become 80% to 120% instead? Exactly (+/-0.2) — Kind regards, Mittyri |
Helmut ★★★ Vienna, Austria, 2016-02-18 14:38 (3259 d 16:19 ago) @ mittyri Posting: # 16006 Views: 8,886 |
|
Dear all, don’t mix up differences with percentages. It’s up to you (maybe supported by a scientific advice) to consider which deviation of the endpoint is clinically relevant. See these threads: #11431, #9534, #1870 and the references given within them. — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! Helmut Schütz The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |
lizhao ☆ US, 2016-02-22 21:20 (3255 d 09:37 ago) @ Helmut Posting: # 16017 Views: 8,647 |
|
Dear Helmut and all, Thank you very much for your help! I have done some literature search on Fieller's confidence interval and I am ready to use R to construct the confidence interval. I wonder if you know where I can find some R code/package to compute Fieller's confidence interval? Also, I think the computation depends on parallel or crossover design, as the intrasubject variability would be different? Am I correct? Thanks a lot! |
yjlee168 ★★★ Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2016-02-23 09:23 (3254 d 21:34 ago) @ lizhao Posting: # 16018 Views: 8,685 |
|
Hi lizhao, There is another easy way to calculate Fieller's CI. See this link. Also if you prefer using R/package, see the package mratios . You should be able to find the R codes for Fieller's CI from package mratios . Never used both before. Try it yourself.— All the best, -- Yung-jin Lee bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear Download link (updated) -> here |
d_labes ★★★ Berlin, Germany, 2016-02-23 10:08 (3254 d 20:49 ago) @ lizhao Posting: # 16021 Views: 8,611 |
|
Dear lizhao, package PowerTOST aka "Swiss army knife for lazy guys dealing with BE studies" has a function CI.RatioF() for calculating the Fieller's confidence interval for the designs "2x2" and "parallel" given estimates of the GMR, CV and CVb(between).The theoretical background can be found in: Hauschke et al. Hauschke D., Steinijans V. and Pigeot I. — Regards, Detlew |
Weidson ☆ Brazil, 2024-11-29 00:15 (53 d 06:42 ago) @ d_labes Posting: # 24305 Views: 1,166 |
|
Dear d_labes/Helmut, In the Vasoconstrictor Assay guide published by the FDA in 1995, a small dataset of AUCE values for the test and reference drugs is provided. The purpose of this dataset is to serve as a numerical example for determining the bioequivalence of these two topical formulations (as part of the main study). At the end of the document, Locke's method is applied, yielding a 90% confidence interval of 53.6–165.9%. I’ve read on this forum that Locke's method is considered equivalent to Exact Fieller's method. Using the CI.RatioF() function and the dataset from the guide, I wonder if you could develop a function or script to calculate the Exact Fieller interval and match the result presented in the guide. Importantly, this should be done without directly using the formulas provided in the guide.This seems like a great challenge for you and Helmut, whose answers are always brilliant! Dataset (xlxs-format) |
Helmut ★★★ Vienna, Austria, 2024-12-03 14:39 (48 d 16:18 ago) @ Weidson Posting: # 24306 Views: 1,058 |
|
Hi Weidson, the function CI.RatioF() can only handle parallel and 2×2×2 crossover designs but you have a replicate.You mastered the evaluation in Excel. Alternatively an -script following the FDA’s guidance (the raw data are given in Table AIV.6 of the 1995 guidance). The FDA took accurate calculations lightly (e.g., (–43.63 + –34.36) / 2 ≠ –38.99!).
— Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! Helmut Schütz The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |