Naveen Kumar
☆    

India,
2013-09-23 16:35
(4271 d 05:00 ago)

Posting: # 11543
Views: 3,651
 

 Canada BE limits [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Dear All,

I had done my home work prior to this post.

We refer the data from product monographs available in this website http://webprod5.hc-sc.gc.ca/dpd-bdpp/ while preparing protocols for canadian submissions. I had observed that the health canada accepted the generic submissions even though the results are outside the normal BE limits(i.e. 80-125%).

For eg. Nabilone and Omeprazole,

Omeprazole Cmax 90% CI are -71.93 to 121.63 % http://webprod5.hc-sc.gc.ca/dpd-bdpp/info.do?code=79591&lang=eng
and the limits are out side the 80 - 125%.

Nabilone Cmax 90 % CI are 77.56 - 100.45%, http://webprod5.hc-sc.gc.ca/dpd-bdpp/info.do?code=87819&lang=eng

I had gone through the canadian guidelines (1992 to till date) to maximum extent; in any of them i haven't found that the BE limits can be exapanded in certain cases or for some products or a related sentence for acceptability beyond the normal limits.

Can any one let me know what could be the possible reason for accepting the generics which were not in BE limits with the reference product?

Regards,
Naveen Kumar.SR
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2013-09-23 17:08
(4271 d 04:27 ago)

@ Naveen Kumar
Posting: # 11544
Views: 2,921
 

 Canada BE limits

Hi Naveen,

❝ I had done my home work prior to this post.


Really? :lookaround:
Canada’s HPFB/TGD never (!) required a confidence interval for Cmax; only the GMR has to be within 80.0–125.0% (Section 2.1.b). This requirement was clearly met in your examples (GMRs 93.54 and 88.27%).
According to the current guidance 90% CIs are required for NTIDs (Section 2.1.1.6); acceptance ranges are 90.0–112.0% for AUC and 80.0–125.0% for Cmax.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,683 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Being really good at C++ is like being really good
at using rocks to sharpen sticks.    Thant Tessman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5