maverick
☆    

India,
2010-11-23 07:32
(5672 d 23:57 ago)

Posting: # 6191
Views: 2,755
 

 bioanalysis [Regulatives / Guidelines]

dear all,
I'd like to know for Pioglitazone analysis, whether we also need to analyse M - III (Keto derivative of Pioglitazone) or only M-IV and parent. it's for Brasil-submission.


waiting!!
Dr_Dan
★★  

Germany,
2010-11-23 10:44
(5672 d 20:45 ago)

@ maverick
Posting: # 6192
Views: 2,235
 

 bioanalysis

Dear Maverick
In principle, evaluation of bioequivalence should be based upon measured concentrations of the parent compound. The reason for this is that Cmax of a parent compound is usually more sensitive to detect differences between formulations in absorption rate than Cmax of a metabolite. So in your case the bioequivalence decision should be based on Pioglitazone alone. Pioglitazone is not a prodrug. Three of six metabolites are activ. Pioglitazone and the M-III metabolite have the same contribution to clinical efficacy, the M-IV metabolite is 6 times more potent, the efficacy of the M-II metabolite is less. If you can measure the M-III metabolite in the same run then I would suggest to do it but ensure that the statistics regarding the metabolites are descriptive and not conformativ.
I hope this helps
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
429 visitors (0 registered, 429 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is not every question that deserves an answer.    Publilius Syrus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5