|
maverick ☆ India, 2010-11-23 07:32 (5672 d 23:57 ago) Posting: # 6191 Views: 2,755 |
|
|
dear all, I'd like to know for Pioglitazone analysis, whether we also need to analyse M - III (Keto derivative of Pioglitazone) or only M-IV and parent. it's for Brasil-submission. waiting!! |
|
Dr_Dan ★★ Germany, 2010-11-23 10:44 (5672 d 20:45 ago) @ maverick Posting: # 6192 Views: 2,235 |
|
|
Dear Maverick In principle, evaluation of bioequivalence should be based upon measured concentrations of the parent compound. The reason for this is that Cmax of a parent compound is usually more sensitive to detect differences between formulations in absorption rate than Cmax of a metabolite. So in your case the bioequivalence decision should be based on Pioglitazone alone. Pioglitazone is not a prodrug. Three of six metabolites are activ. Pioglitazone and the M-III metabolite have the same contribution to clinical efficacy, the M-IV metabolite is 6 times more potent, the efficacy of the M-II metabolite is less. If you can measure the M-III metabolite in the same run then I would suggest to do it but ensure that the statistics regarding the metabolites are descriptive and not conformativ. I hope this helps Kind regards Dan — Kind regards and have a nice day Dr_Dan |
