Aceto81
★    

Belgium,
2009-04-28 16:29
(6256 d 08:12 ago)

Posting: # 3628
Views: 11,241
 

 Preservative efficacy tests [Off Topic]

Hi,

I know this is Off Topic, but maybe someone can point me in the right direction, or know some forum where someone can help me?

I'm performing a preservative efficacy test on an oil based pharmaceutical product.
After trying with different preservatives (benzylalcohol, methyl and propylparahydroxybenzoate, propyl galate, some combinations) and different concentrations (up to 4 mg methylparahydroxybenzoate, just to test) the conclusion is always the same: PET test failed.

Now I'm wondering if it's possible the innoculum forms some micels in the oil, so that the preservative won't be able to do his job?

Any ideas about what is going on, or how to get the test passed?
Or is this test not needed in oil based formulations?


Best regards

Ace
g.sharma
☆    

2009-05-19 16:55
(6235 d 07:45 ago)

@ Aceto81
Posting: # 3705
Views: 9,167
 

 Preservative efficacy tests

Is this a liquid formulation or semisolid formulation?
Aceto81
★    

Belgium,
2009-05-19 19:32
(6235 d 05:08 ago)

@ g.sharma
Posting: # 3710
Views: 9,116
 

 Preservative efficacy tests

❝ Is this a liquid formulation or semisolid formulation?


The product where this topic was about is a liquid formulation, but in the mean time we have got the same problem with a semisolid formulation.

Ace
g.sharma
☆    

2009-05-20 15:46
(6234 d 08:55 ago)

@ Aceto81
Posting: # 3717
Views: 9,105
 

 Preservative efficacy tests

❝ ❝ Is this a liquid formulation or semisolid formulation?

❝ The product where this topic was about is a liquid formulation, but in the

❝ mean time we have got the same problem with a semisolid formulation.


@aceto
It has been seem that pareben give good results with oil based formulations.
please ensure that you add presevative in the phase it has higher solubility and dissolve before making the final formulations.

It has been observed with Partitioning studies poor correlation between aqueous solubility and content of the preservatives in the aqueous phase of the emulsion. Incorporation of preservative into different microscopic structures of the emulsion is proposed as a reason for such effect. Higher concentration of antimicrobials or their combination may be required for efficient preservation of submicron emulsions.

gary
Aceto81
★    

Belgium,
2009-05-26 12:21
(6228 d 12:20 ago)

@ g.sharma
Posting: # 3759
Views: 9,072
 

 Preservative efficacy tests

❝ It has been seem that pareben give good results with oil based

❝ formulations.

❝ please ensure that you add presevative in the phase it has higher

❝ solubility and dissolve before making the final formulations.


I'm sure it was fully dissolved before making the final formulation.
In our oil based solution, which is clear, we can see wether it's dissolved or not. We even took an aliquote and put it in the refrigerator to ensure the solubility won't be a problem.

❝ Higher concentration of antimicrobials or their combination may be

❝ required for efficient preservation of submicron emulsions.


Higher than 4mg/ml methylparahydroxybenzoate in combination with 2mg/ml propylparahydroxybenzoate? This was the highest concentration we tested with no results....

Thanks for your help

Ace
larissabsouza
●    

2011-04-28 05:53
(5526 d 18:48 ago)

(edited on 2011-04-28 10:20)
@ Aceto81
Posting: # 6951
Views: 8,541
 

 Preservative efficacy tests

Hi,

I know has been a long time since you posted this. I'm having exactly the same problem in my PET on an oil based formulation.
Did you figure out how to get the test passed?

How were you preparing the innoculum?

Regards,
Larissa


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Ohlbe]
Aceto81
★    

Belgium,
2011-04-28 12:45
(5526 d 11:56 ago)

@ larissabsouza
Posting: # 6961
Views: 8,590
 

 Preservative efficacy tests

Hi,

finally we had some discussions with a microbiologist, and the conclusion was using the determination of water activity and using this very low value to prove that there isn't any bacterial growth allowed.
We aren't sure this is 100%waterproof, but it was the best we had.
If you can find a better way, please do post.


Good luck


Ace
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have never in my life learned anything
from any man who agreed with me.    Dudley Field Malone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5