paulhurleyuk
☆    

NE UK,
2017-01-26 12:04
(3425 d 10:08 ago)

Posting: # 16995
Views: 7,185
 

 Students given 30g dose of Caffeine in Sports study [Off Topic]

Local to me, this story about a study in a sports science course of the effect of caffeine on exercise;

http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/25/students-left-fighting-for-life-after-taking-enough-caffeine-for-300-cups-of-coffee-6405671/

From the story; this trial had been conducted as part of the teaching course for many years, but had switched from tablets to caffeine powder. For this trial a member of staff calculated dosage using a mobile phone instead of a calculator, and the decimal place was misplaced, hence a dose of 30g, not 0.3g ! (Check out the pictures in the article comparing these two doses...)

Out of interest, Caffeine is released and available, so this isn't a clinical trial, but what regulations do apply ?

Paul.
Dr_Dan
★★  

Germany,
2017-01-31 09:42
(3420 d 12:30 ago)

@ paulhurleyuk
Posting: # 16999
Views: 5,512
 

 Clinical trial? According to ICH-GCP definition yes!

❝ Out of interest, Caffeine is released and available, so this isn't a clinical trial, but what regulations do apply ?


Dear Paul
According to ICH-GCP a clinical trial is any investigation in human subjects intended to discover or verify the clinical, pharmacological and/or other pharmacodynamic effects of an investigational product(s), and/or to identify any adverse reactions to an investigational product(s), and/or to study absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of an investigational product(s) with the object of ascertaining ist safety and/or efficacy.
IMHO the students were treated with a drug (coffeine as pure drug and not as cup of coffee) and nobody thought about the consequences neither for the students nor for themselves.

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
115 visitors (0 registered, 115 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5