janmacek
☆    

Czech Republic,
2012-12-10 12:47
(4552 d 21:09 ago)

Posting: # 9703
Views: 3,527
 

 Criterion for incurred samples [Bioanalytics]

Dear colleagues,

I know that all people use the following criterion for incurred samples: the difference between original measurement and reanalysis should be lower than 20%. However, the Guideline on bioanalytical method validation has different wording: "The concentration obtained for the initial analysis and the concentration obtained by reanalysis should be within 20% of their mean for at least 67% of the repeats."

What does it exactly mean? For example, if X1=81 and X2=119, their mean is 100, 20% of the mean is 20. So the concentrations are within 20% of their mean if they are within the interval 80-120. Please note that the Guideline does not speak about difference of the measurements, mathematically I understand this statement as two conditions for X1 and X2 that must be fulfilled simultaneously.

I am aware of the fact that my opinion is provocative, but is it wrong?

With best regards,

Jan
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2012-12-10 13:37
(4552 d 20:20 ago)

@ janmacek
Posting: # 9705
Views: 2,972
 

 Criterion for incurred samples

Dear Jan,

The wording in the guideline is indeed unclear. I know it has been pointed out a couple of times at various workshops. What I heard is that the PKWP would consider issuing a clarification if confusion was seen in future.

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
64 visitors (0 registered, 64 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s difficult to work in a group
when you are omnipotent.    John de Lancie (as Q)

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5