janmacek
☆    

Czech Republic,
2012-12-10 12:47
(4552 d 10:56 ago)

Posting: # 9703
Views: 3,522
 

 Criterion for incurred samples [Bioanalytics]

Dear colleagues,

I know that all people use the following criterion for incurred samples: the difference between original measurement and reanalysis should be lower than 20%. However, the Guideline on bioanalytical method validation has different wording: "The concentration obtained for the initial analysis and the concentration obtained by reanalysis should be within 20% of their mean for at least 67% of the repeats."

What does it exactly mean? For example, if X1=81 and X2=119, their mean is 100, 20% of the mean is 20. So the concentrations are within 20% of their mean if they are within the interval 80-120. Please note that the Guideline does not speak about difference of the measurements, mathematically I understand this statement as two conditions for X1 and X2 that must be fulfilled simultaneously.

I am aware of the fact that my opinion is provocative, but is it wrong?

With best regards,

Jan
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2012-12-10 13:37
(4552 d 10:07 ago)

@ janmacek
Posting: # 9705
Views: 2,970
 

 Criterion for incurred samples

Dear Jan,

The wording in the guideline is indeed unclear. I know it has been pointed out a couple of times at various workshops. What I heard is that the PKWP would consider issuing a clarification if confusion was seen in future.

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
66 visitors (0 registered, 66 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Every man gets a narrower and narrower field of knowledge
in which he must be an expert in order to compete with other people.
The specialist knows more and more about less and less
and finally knows everything about nothing.    Konrad Lorenz

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5