haydonat
☆    

Turkey,
2012-01-30 15:27
(4869 d 19:05 ago)

(edited on 2012-01-30 18:13)
Posting: # 8017
Views: 4,484
 

 acceptance criteria of calibration standards [Bioanalytics]

Dear all,

We have 8 calibration standards in each study batches. If three of CC standards are out of range according to guidance (EMA), should we reject the batch directly or should we excluded the highest deviation CC first than calibration curve re-calculated again. If other CCs are still failing, the one with the highest deviation is excluded and so on?

Thank you for your interest.

Best regards.


Edit: category changed [Ohlbe]
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2012-01-30 19:11
(4869 d 15:21 ago)

@ haydonat
Posting: # 8018
Views: 3,815
 

 acceptance criteria of calibration standards

Dear Haydonat,

I would consider both approaches to be acceptable, though I would personally prefer the second. Define the process in your SOP.

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe
haydonat
☆    

Turkey,
2012-01-31 16:02
(4868 d 18:29 ago)

(edited on 2012-01-31 17:58)
@ Ohlbe
Posting: # 8026
Views: 3,956
 

 acceptance criteria of calibration standards

Thank you for your response :-)

But I want to ask another case we have 8 calibration standards and 6 of them out of range:confused:
Actually if we look at the areas of analyte only one value of CC is not suitable. If we exclude this CC, all of the CCs were in range.
But if we look the deviations of CC samples we exclude highest deviation of CC firstly than one more CC sample is out of range and again this value excluded. But one of the CC sample which have highest deviation and firstly excluded is in the range:-)
At the result we exclude the two CC samples but one of them is in range.

What do you suggest us about this situation?:-)

Regard
Hale


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Ohlbe]
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2012-01-31 19:05
(4868 d 15:27 ago)

@ haydonat
Posting: # 8031
Views: 3,832
 

 acceptance criteria of calibration standards

Dear Hale,

❝ But if we look the deviations of CC samples we exclude highest deviation of CC firstly than one more CC sample is out of range and again this value excluded. But one of the CC sample which have highest deviation and firstly excluded is in the range:-)

❝ At the result we exclude the two CC samples but one of them is in range.


Hey, I had not come across that situation before... It confirms the need to look at the graph, not just at the digits. No idea what I would do, I would need to look at the data.

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,683 registered users;
75 visitors (0 registered, 75 guests [including 50 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nerds don’t just happen to dress informally.
They do it too consistently.
Consciously or not, they dress informally
as a prophylactic measure against stupidity.    Paul Graham

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5