moblak
☆    

2010-04-21 18:06
(5908 d 05:36 ago)

Posting: # 5180
Views: 3,576
 

 Cross-validation? [Bioanalytics]

Hi everyone,

in the past, we have validated (FDA, EMA) an LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of parent compound and its three metabolites in human plasma.
For internal standard a mixture of all four corresponding deuterated standards was used.

Now, we would like to use this method for determination of parent compound only.
We intend to prepare the CCs and QCs only for the parent compound (no metabolites in the plasma samples), while for the internal standard only corresponding deuterated standard of the parent compound would be used.

Is there any additional cross-validation needed in such case? Any other suggestions?

Many thanks
Marko
Geokad
☆    

Canada,
2010-04-23 19:50
(5906 d 03:52 ago)

@ moblak
Posting: # 5206
Views: 2,908
 

 Cross-validation?

Hi Marko,

❝ We intend to prepare the CCs and QCs only for the parent compound (no

❝ metabolites in the plasma samples),


Personally, I do not recommend that. All your evaluations were done in the presence of 4 analytes. Your method performance might be different if you don't have all of them in there (e.g. competition).

Regards, Geokad
moblak
☆    

2010-04-28 13:49
(5901 d 09:54 ago)

@ Geokad
Posting: # 5255
Views: 2,862
 

 Cross-validation?

Hi Geokad,

since I usually take a rather conservative approach, I sort of agree with you. :cool:

But on the other hand, if this would be true: "Your method performance might be different if you don't have all of them in there ..."...then I would have a BIG problem with any method that is used for the measurement of parent compound only (while other (in)active metabolites are also present in the matrix).

The way I (could) see the situation is as follows:

Method 1:
validated method for parent compound only (selectivity and (no) matrix effect demonstrated for the presence of three (in)active metabolites)

Method 2:
validated method for parent compound and three (in)active metabolites. The same chromatographic conditions as in method 1 and nearly the "same" sample preparation as in method 1 (QC and CC samples contain parent compound and all three metabolites, while IS solution is a mix of all four deuterated analogs)

Method 1 can be used to quantify only parent compound in the presence of metabolites, whereas method 2 can be used to quantify parent compound AND metabolites. IMHO method 2 has added value compared to method 1 and could be "reduced" to quantify parent compound only.

Would one A/P experiment with parent compound only and IS (mix, no mix?) be sufficient for cross validation.

Any other suggestions/opinions are welcome...

Regards
Marko
Debbie
★    

India,
2010-04-28 19:53
(5901 d 03:50 ago)

@ moblak
Posting: # 5260
Views: 2,812
 

 Cross-validation?

Hi,

i think you can use your combination method(parent and metabolites) to quantify only parent compound.

as you said establishing one precison and accuracy batch with only parent compund and its internal standard would suffice the requirement to test the method performance.

Regards,
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2010-04-29 02:38
(5900 d 21:05 ago)

@ Debbie
Posting: # 5264
Views: 2,834
 

 Cross-validation?

Dear all,

I would agree with Debbie, at least if you have demonstrated that you have no selectivity issue and no ion suppression / enhancement from any of the 3 metabolites and corresponding 3 SIL IS on the parent and corresponding IS.

(If you did have selectivity or matrix effects issues, your combined method would be flawed anyway as you will never have a fixed proportion of the 4 analytes in your study samples).

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
242 visitors (0 registered, 242 guests [including 144 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5