nvs
☆    

India,
2009-02-25 06:04
(6329 d 07:48 ago)

Posting: # 3287
Views: 3,482
 

 Values > ULOQ, dilution [Bioanalytics]

Dear all,
We got some ULOQ concentrations during the study sample analysis. We repeated the samples under the code of Upper limit of quantification. In that batch (repeated batch) we analyzed other repeats like IS variations etc... & we put some DQCs (dilution integrity quality control samples).
In that batch everything was ok, and batch was accepted.
But the DQC samples were not meeting the specification.
But the repeated concentrations (ULOQ repeats) were with in the calibration range.
So again ULOQ samples were taken for repeat.
So which code has to given for that samples.
During the second repetition they are not ULOQ's. We repeated because of failure of DQC's.

--
Edit: Category & subject line changed. [Helmut]
Geokad
☆    

Canada,
2009-02-26 20:36
(6327 d 17:15 ago)

@ nvs
Posting: # 3291
Views: 2,703
 

 Values > ULOQ, dilution

Dear nvs,

❝ So which code has to given for that samples.

❝ During the second repetition they are not ULOQ's. We repeated because of

❝ failure of DQC's.


You can use the code for samples lost in processing or the code for inadequate dilution. Whichever code you use, you should have an SOP detailing all the codes that you use and when to apply them.

Regards, Geokad
nvs
☆    

India,
2009-02-27 06:15
(6327 d 07:36 ago)

@ Geokad
Posting: # 3292
Views: 2,706
 

 Values > ULOQ, dilution

Dear Geokad,
Thank you for your reply.
We have the codes, related to this issue is
o Processing error,
o System failure,
o Above upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) and
o Others (for other repeats which is not defined in the SOP) etc...

So I think...
It's not ULOQ because it is within the calibration range. (second time repeat analysis)
It's not system failure because rest of the batch was passed.

So is it comes under either processing error or others. (we already proved dilution integrity in validation itself) :-(


Thank you

Regards
nvs
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
116 visitors (0 registered, 116 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5