BEAZ
★    

India,
2008-11-18 10:36
(6428 d 09:03 ago)

Posting: # 2705
Views: 4,797
 

 Pre dose conc [Bioanalytics]

Hai,
In a cross overstudy with adequate washout period.we are getting predose concentration, kindly any one clarify what would be the reason for this phenomenon.The analytical team assures that there were no process error and it is due to noise (Back calculation of the area observed ). The sample is predose blank.
thanks in advance

Alhas
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2008-11-18 11:02
(6428 d 08:36 ago)

@ BEAZ
Posting: # 2707
Views: 4,001
 

 Pre dose conc

Dear Alhas,

could you provide a little more info?
One one hand you seem to be looking for the reason, but on the other hand your analytical staff seems to have come up with the reason for you.

What drug? What period (is it a crossover trial)? Test or ref? How long washout?

EM.
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2008-11-18 11:17
(6428 d 08:21 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 2708
Views: 3,959
 

 Pre dose conc

Dear Alhas,

Some additional questions:
- how much is your pre-dose concentration, compared to Cmax ? Compared to LLOQ ?
- are your bioanalytical people sure it can't be due to carry-over (did they check carry-over during the method validation ?) ?

Regards
Ohlbe
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2008-11-18 12:02
(6428 d 07:36 ago)

@ Ohlbe
Posting: # 2711
Views: 4,032
 

 Pre dose conc

...and what do the anova figures for period and sequence effects look like?

EM.
BEAZ
★    

India,
2008-11-19 14:47
(6427 d 04:51 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 2739
Views: 3,892
 

 Pre dose conc

❝ ...and what do the anova figures for period and sequence effects look

❝ like?


dear Em,
it is in analytical phase only, observing the data (LCMS/MS output) only raised the query to get more clarity.
thanks and regards

Alhas
BEAZ
★    

India,
2008-11-19 14:45
(6427 d 04:54 ago)

@ Ohlbe
Posting: # 2738
Views: 3,894
 

 Pre dose conc

Dear Ohlbe,
thank you

❝ Some additional questions:

❝ - how much is your pre-dose concentration, compared to Cmax ? Compared to

❝ LLOQ ?

❝ - are your bioanalytical people sure it can't be due to carry-over (did

❝ they check carry-over during the method validation ?) ?


this i have to confirm and let you know.
regards

Alhas
BEAZ
★    

India,
2008-11-19 14:37
(6427 d 05:01 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 2737
Views: 3,874
 

 Pre dose conc

Dear EM,

Thanks for the response

❝ One one hand you seem to be looking for the reason, but on the other hand

❝ your analytical staff seems to have come up with the reason for you.


you are right, but am not satisfied with the response from the analytical team

❝ What drug? What period (is it a crossover trial)? Test or ref? How long

❝ washout?


Ethambutol, Cross over, one week washout.

--
Edit: Please don't edit within the quoted original post in order to keep the structure intact. [Helmut]

Alhas
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
153 visitors (0 registered, 153 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5