|
vish14184 ★ India, 2008-05-20 11:16 (6607 d 20:14 ago) Posting: # 1857 Views: 4,046 |
|
|
Dear All, During checking of Spiking solution check (LC-MS/MS) data. I have observed that Spiking Solution concentration (Vial Preparation) is prepared almost double to the nominal concentration. e.g. Dilution details as per spiking sheet, STD-1
S.S. conc. SS vol Final vol final conc (nominal concentration) However, In spiking solution check for vial preparation-SS vol taken 40 ul (S.S. concs-2.024) and make total vol. 1000uL. However, Calculated concentration obtain near to nominal concentration. I would like to know that is it possible? If possible please give me explanation How it is possible? Thank you, Regards Vishal Nakrani -- Edit: Tabs replaced by BBCode to format the table. [Helmut] |
|
Jaime_R ★★ Barcelona, 2008-05-20 16:16 (6607 d 15:14 ago) @ vish14184 Posting: # 1858 Views: 3,205 |
|
|
Hi Vishal! ❝ I have observed that Spiking Solution concentration (Vial Preparation) ❝ is prepared almost double to the nominal concentration. Your 1st dilution is 1:50 (200 uL -> 10 mL), making 2.024 ug/mL -> 40.48 ng/mL, your 2nd dilution is 1:25 (40 uL -> 1 mL), therefore 2.024 ug/mL -> 80.96 ng/mL. — Regards, Jaime |
|
vish14184 ★ India, 2008-05-20 17:03 (6607 d 14:27 ago) @ Jaime_R Posting: # 1859 Views: 3,259 |
|
|
❝ Your first dilution is 1:50 (0.2mL -> 10mL), making 2.024ug/mL -> ❝ 40.48ng/mL, ❝ your second dilution is 1:25 (40uL -> 1mL), therefore 2.024ug/mL -> ❝ 80.96ng/mL. Dear jaime, you are right. aqueous Spiking solution dilution is as per Second dilution. First dilution is not prepared i have give this information for understand how to obtain double concentration of spiking solution. i want to know that if we prepare aqueous 80.96 ng/ml (40ul in to 1 ml) concentration solution and inject in LC-MS-MS for spiking solution check. Is it Possible to obtain back calucalted concentration around 40.48 ng/ml? Spiking Solution prepared 80.96 ng/ml for that nominal concentration consider 40.48 ng/ml IF u want to more information in detail i will provide you. Thank you Regards vishal Nakrani -- Edit: Full quote removed. Please see this post! [HS] |
