Ken Peh ★ Malaysia, 2014-04-11 18:37 (4062 d 10:19 ago) Posting: # 12816 Views: 5,931 |
|
Dear All, Highly appreciate your inputs on the questions below. (i) Is ISR necessary for pilot study ? (2) For BE study using pharmacodynamic parameters, for example measurement of serum glucose level performed by pathology lab, what are the parameters to be performed in method validation ? The instrument and approach used for glucose determination in pathology lab is different from analytical lab. Limited (2 levels) standard reagents are used and no QC samples. Thank you. Regards, Ken |
jag009 ★★★ NJ, 2014-04-11 19:50 (4062 d 09:06 ago) @ Ken Peh Posting: # 12817 Views: 5,102 |
|
Hi Ken, ❝ (i) Is ISR necessary for pilot study ? FDA? No. But for us if the assay is newly developed then we would ask the lab to do ISR (yes for a pilot study) just to make sure things are okay. John |
Ohlbe ★★★ France, 2014-04-11 19:59 (4062 d 08:57 ago) @ Ken Peh Posting: # 12820 Views: 5,053 |
|
Dear Ken, ❝ (i) Is ISR necessary for pilot study ? I agree with John: I would say it is not mandatory, but if you want to be on the safe side, you can run some ISR samples to make sure there is no big problem with your method before you use it in the pivotal study. ❝ (2) For BE study using pharmacodynamic parameters, for example measurement of serum glucose level performed by pathology lab, what are the parameters to be performed in method validation ? The instrument and approach used for glucose determination in pathology lab is different from analytical lab. Limited (2 levels) standard reagents are used and no QC samples. QC samples are commercially available (but they usually have rather large acceptance ranges). I would say the first thing is to make sure the equipment and reagents you use have been validated by the vendor (in Europe we have a CE-marking that is supposed to show this). Performing yourself a full validation the same way you would do it for a bioanalytical method would be a challenge (difficult to prepare well standardised calibration and QC samples for these endogeneous substances), but you can at least check the precision of your method using pooled samples at low and high levels. Use commercial QCs during routine sample analysis. — Regards Ohlbe |
jag009 ★★★ NJ, 2014-04-11 23:44 (4062 d 05:12 ago) @ Ohlbe Posting: # 12821 Views: 5,042 |
|
Hi Ken, ❝ I would say the first thing is to make sure the equipment and reagents you use have been validated by the vendor (in Europe we have a CE-marking that is supposed to show this). Performing yourself a full validation the same way you would do it for a bioanalytical method would be a challenge (difficult to prepare well standardised calibration and QC samples for these endogeneous substances), but you can at least check the precision of your method using pooled samples at low and high levels. Use commercial QCs during routine sample analysis. Agree with Ohlbe. I ran a antihypertive PK/PD study using holter monitor for 24 hour BP monitoring and the devices were validated and calibrated by the vendor. John |
Ken Peh ★ Malaysia, 2014-04-12 10:32 (4061 d 18:24 ago) @ jag009 Posting: # 12824 Views: 4,958 |
|
Dear John and Ohlbe, Thank you very much for the input. Regards, Ken |