The Outlaw Torn
★    

Europe,
2011-11-02 13:49
(5346 d 17:37 ago)

Posting: # 7584
Views: 4,490
 

 Most sensitive [Design Issues]

Dear all,

The guidelines say that single dose studies are the most sensitive at distinguishing formulation effects (section 4.1.1). However, we keep getting statements like this from authorities: A multiple dose study at the highest dose strength is considered to be most sensitive model for detecting differences.

Can someone explain why that would be so? And are there papers that discuss this?

Thanks.
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2011-11-02 16:31
(5346 d 14:55 ago)

@ The Outlaw Torn
Posting: # 7585
Views: 3,781
 

 Steady state most sensitive: in some particular cases – yes

Dear TOT!

❝ […] we keep getting statements like this from authorities: A multiple dose study at the highest dose strength is considered to be most sensitive model for detecting differences.


Very interesting. In some particular cases valid (see below).

❝ Can someone explain why that would be so? And are there papers that discuss this?


Some basic work was done by the FDA1,2 and recently by a Spanish group.3,4 Note one of the co-authors. ;-)

From the last papers’ concluding remarks:

Parent drug in single dose is usually the most sensitive analyte for demonstration of bioequi­va­lence in case of drugs with linear kinetics and only hepatic pre-systemic metabolism. The only exception to this general rule is BCS Class III drugs with low intrinsic clearance, which are ex­pected to be very infrequent and to show non-linear kinetics due to limited absorption caused by a limited operative absorption time or absorption window. In this exceptional case the parent drug in steady state seems to be the most sensitive analyte.3
It can be concluded that when the pre-systemic metabolism (linear or non-linear) of the parent drug is only hepatic, metabolite does not show higher sensitivity than parent drug to changes in the pharmaceutical performance. The outcome of this simulation work supports the present requirement of a steady state design in case of dose- (or time-) dependent pharmacokinetics in addition to single dose investigation detailed in the CHMP Note for Guidance on the Investi­ga­tion of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence since, in the investigated pharmacokinetic model with saturated hepatic first-pass metabolism of the parent drug, the steady state design has shown to be more sensitive to detect differences between formulations in some of the investigated scenarios. It would be the responsibility of the applicant to investigate (e.g. with the metho­do­logy described in this simulation work) the pharmacokinetic model of the drug under investi­ga­tion to identify whether the additional steady state study is necessary and should be required or not.4



  1. Chen M-L and AJ Jackson
    The Role of Metabolites in Bioequivalence Assessment. I. Linear Pharmacokinetics without First-Pass Effect
    Pharm Res 8(1), 25–32 (1991)
  2. Chen M-L and AJ Jackson
    The Role of Metabolites in Bioequivalence Assessment. II. Drugs with Linear Pharmacokinetics and First-Pass Effect
    Pharm Res 12(5), 700–8 (1995)
  3. Fernández-Teruel C, Nalda Molina R, González-Alvarez I, Navarro-Fontestada C, García-Arieta A, Casabóa VC, and M Bermejo
    Computer simulations of bioequivalence trials: Selection of design and analyte in BCS drugs with first-pass hepatic metabolism: Linear kinetics (I)
    Eur J Pharm Sci 36, 137–46 (2009)
  4. Fernández-Teruel C, González-Alvarez I, Navarro-Fontestada C, García-Arieta A, Bermejo M, and VG Casabó
    Computer simulations of bioequivalence trials: Selection of design and analyte in BCS drugs with first-pass hepatic metabolism: Part II. Non-linear kinetics
    Eur J Pharm Sci 36, 147–56 (2009)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
The Outlaw Torn
★    

Europe,
2011-11-03 13:26
(5345 d 18:00 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 7591
Views: 3,636
 

 Steady state most sensitive: in some particular cases – yes

Looks like I've got some reading to do.

Many thanks, Helmut.
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2011-11-03 13:28
(5345 d 17:58 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 7592
Views: 3,629
 

 Steady state most sensitive: in some particular cases – yes

Hi HS,

❝ Some basic work was done by the FDA1,2 and recently by a Spanish group.3,4 Note one of the co-authors. ;-)


Ah, so we can't get approvals on basis of simulations but regulators can use simulations to define regulatory requirements :confused:?!

Best regards,
EM.
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2011-11-03 15:46
(5345 d 15:40 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 7595
Views: 3,645
 

 Why, oh why?

Dear ElMaestro!

❝ Ah, so we can't get approvals on basis of simulations but regulators can use simulations to define regulatory requirements :confused:?!


Sure. All the fancy scaling stuff is based on simulations. Even worse: A lot is based on gut feeling (Δ 20%: Wilfred Westlake’s colleagues at Smith, Kline & French; EMA’s crippled scaling methods A/B), politiks (scaling; PE restriction within 80–1.25%: Les Benet), prejudice (nonparametrics), and…

I bet a month’s salary that regulators never performed sumfink like this before they came up with their strange requirement of dropping a formulation in a high-order crossover.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
139 visitors (1 registered, 138 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5