bjkim97
☆    

Korea / Seoul,
2011-02-22 06:19
(5605 d 11:41 ago)

Posting: # 6656
Views: 3,369
 

 Carvedilol of Bioequivalence [Design Issues]

hi~ all

Again, I want to hear your opinion come to writting.

The drug is Carvedilol.

Development a protocol for your reference to make decisions based on what basis do you decide?

As following fasted-three data

Fast-Study (#1)

Fast-Study (#2)

Bioequivalence study of Two Different Tablet Formulation of Carvedilol in Healthy Volunteers Drug Res.55, no. 4, 212-217(2005) Fast-study (#3)

The following three kinds of data you anything, would develop a protocol based on?

And why can you tell me whether it is based? I do not care more than your own logic


My stupid another question.

Fed-Study (#1)

Fed-Study (#1) and fast-study (#1) and fast-study (#2)
They all recived the same approval by MHRA it looks like carvedilol of drug

In korea, usually first generic is fasted study
second generic is fasted study...

and then in MHRA Some tests fasted study... some tests fed study...

Can I do this only in your country? in our country, I pretty much can not do
"OTL" <== "Setback mode" :-D

Wait for your sincere answers ^^;;

Thank you so much...

BJ


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
301 visitors (0 registered, 301 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5