Janardhan
●    

2007-12-26 10:38
(6755 d 06:30 ago)

Posting: # 1423
Views: 6,616
 

 Randomisation [Design Issues]

Can any one give definitons of terms used in Randomisation (Ex:- Blocks, Sequence, etc.) with examples.
Also suggest some sites which give clear definitions in understanding of cross over design, parallel design etc. with examples.

--
Edit: Category changed. [HS]
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2007-12-29 15:04
(6752 d 02:04 ago)

@ Janardhan
Posting: # 1437
Views: 5,705
 

 Randomisation

Dear Janardhan!

Please have a look at the policy first.

❝ Can any one give definitons of terms used in Randomisation (Ex:- Blocks, Sequence, etc.) with examples.


A sequence denotes the order a subject receives treatments in a cross-over design.
A block is the smallest unit where all possibles sequences are contained in.
In a 2×2 cross-over design, there are two possible sequences (S); therefore the smallest block is of size two (or in other words, the total sample size is always an even number):
    +-------+
    |Period |
+---+---+---+
| S | 1 | 2 |
+---+---+---+
| 1 | A | B |
| 2 | B | A |
+---+---+---+


In a 6×3 cross-over design (Williams' design for 3 treatments), there are six possible sequences; the smallest block is of size six (the sample size is a multiple of 6):
    +-----------+
    |   Period  |
+---+---+---+---+
| S | 1 | 2 | 3 |
+---+---+---+---+
| 1 | A | B | C |
| 2 | B | C | A |
| 3 | C | A | B |
| 4 | A | C | B |
| 5 | B | A | C |
| 6 | C | B | A |
+---+---+---+---+


In a 4×4 cross-over design (Williams' design for 4 treatments), there are four possible sequences; the smallest block is of size four (the sample size is a multiple of 4):
    +---------------+
    |     Period    |
+---+---+---+---+---+
| S | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
+---+---+---+---+---+
| 1 | A | D | B | C |
| 2 | B | A | C | D |
| 3 | C | B | D | A |
| 4 | D | C | A | B |
+---+---+---+---+---+


In a parallel design there are no sequences (each subject receives only one of the possible n treatments). The sample size is a multiple of n.

The block size does not play an important role in BE studies, since they are
  • single center, and
  • open labeled.
Only if multiple groups are employed (e.g., due to logistic reasons or limited capacity of the clinical site), groups should be allocated (statistical term: stratified) in such a way, that each group contains complete blocks.
Example:
6×3 design, sample size 30, clinical capacity 18 beds.
1st group 18 subjects (3 blocks of 6 sequences), 2nd group 12 subjects (2 blocks of 2 sequences).

❝ Also suggest some sites which give clear definitions in understanding of cross over design, parallel design etc. with examples.


For the three basic designs see one of my lectures (slide 12pp for the 2×2 cross-over, slide 22pp for the parallel design, and slides 25pp for a higher-order cross-over design).

If you are interested not only in the total intra-subject variability (CVintra), but also in the variability due to treatments, a replicate design must be applied.
The two most commonly used ones are:
For reference variability the 3×2 design (3 period, 2 sequence):
    +-----------+
    |   Period  |
+---+---+---+---+
| S | 1 | 2 | 3 |
+---+---+---+---+
| 1 | T | R | T |
| 2 | R | T | R |
+---+---+---+---+

For test/reference variability the 4×2 design (4 period, 2 sequence):
    +---------------+
    |     Period    |
+---+---+---+---+---+
| S | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
+---+---+---+---+---+
| 1 | T | R | T | R |
| 2 | R | T | R | T |
+---+---+---+---+---+

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
MGR
★    

India,
2007-12-31 08:20
(6750 d 08:47 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 1442
Views: 5,297
 

 Randomisation

Hi HS,

A small doubt regarding the example you had given,

❝ Example:

❝ 6x3 design, sample size 30, clinical capacity 18 beds.

❝ 1st group 18 subjects (3 blocks of 6 sequences), 2nd group 12 subjects (2 blocks of 2 sequences).


In this type of study (means conducting in two groups) Is it compulsory to generate a randomization schedule seperately for each group? or can we generate the randomization schedule at one time containing all the 30 subjects? Please clarify this. As iam in a confusion that two we had done a study with two groups but the randomization had given at once (means in one schedule at the time of group I check-in)? Iam very grateful if you provide me an answer. Thanks in advance.

Regards,
MGR
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2008-01-02 01:15
(6748 d 15:53 ago)

@ MGR
Posting: # 1449
Views: 5,531
 

 Randomisation

Dear MGR!

❝ In this type of study (means conducting in two groups) Is it compulsory to generate a randomization schedule seperately for each group? or can we generate the randomization schedule at one time containing all the 30 subjects?


No, it isn't. But as I said, I would suggest to stratify the randomization for the two groups, i.e., randomize 3 blocks of 6 sequences (18 subjects) in the first group, and 2 blocks of 6 sequences (12 subjects) in the second.
By this procedure you start with a balanced design not only in the entire sample (30 subjects), but also within both groups.
Statistical inbalance may complicate the evaluation. If you randomize the entire data set of 30 subjects and split them afterwards, it's quite likely that you end up with inbalance to some degree in at least one group.

In real life inbalance occurs frequently due to drop-outs anyway. I think it's no good idea, to start a study already in an inbalanced fashion.

See also this thread.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
MGR
★    

India,
2008-01-02 12:13
(6748 d 04:55 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 1451
Views: 5,379
 

 Randomisation

Dear HS,

Thank you very much for your kind reply and for the explanation.

Regards,
MGR
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
122 visitors (0 registered, 122 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5