BarbaraM
☆    

Greece,
2014-08-07 16:40
(4337 d 15:45 ago)

Posting: # 13347
Views: 10,879
 

 administered dose for drugs dosed per kg body weight [Design Issues]

Dear Group, I would like to have your views on the below issue. A drug as tablets of 500 mg and 1000 mg is to be dosed in real life by calculating the dose per kg body weight (25 mg/kg).
e.g. a patient of 60 kg will receive a single dose of 1500 mg; that is he will get 1 tab of 1000 mg and 1 tab of 500 mg

a patient of 80 kg will receive a single does of 2000 mg; that is he will get 2 tabs of 1000 mg (or 4 tabs of 500 mg).

how should the healthy subjects be dosed in a BE study? should they be dosed by taking into account their body weight (as above) or regardless of their body weight take the 1000 mg tab?

Thanking you in advance for your feedback.
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2014-08-07 17:01
(4337 d 15:24 ago)

@ BarbaraM
Posting: # 13348
Views: 9,593
 

 administered dose for drugs dosed per kg body weight

Hi BarbaraM,

❝ how should the healthy subjects be dosed in a BE study? should they be dosed by taking into account their body weight (as above) or regardless of their body weight take the 1000 mg tab?


As far as I know in practice this should give the same evaluation so it is your choice unless there is a product-specific guidance or safety concerns merits one solution over the other. I would opt for the simplest solution - i.e. fixed dose. Simplest solution often means less variation. You may add some considerations about linearity (proportionality).

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2014-08-07 17:12
(4337 d 15:14 ago)

@ BarbaraM
Posting: # 13349
Views: 9,710
 

 Definition of BE (EMA)

Γειά σου Βαρβάρα!

❝ how should the healthy subjects be dosed in a BE study? should they be dosed by taking into account their body weight […] or regardless of their body weight take the 1000 mg tab?


When you talk about healthy subjects I guess you are referring to bioequivalence? See EMA’s definition:

Two medicinal products containing the same active substance are considered bioequivalent if they are pharmaceutically equivalent or pharmaceutical alternatives and their bioavailabilities (rate and extent) after administration in the same molar dose lie within acceptable predefined limits.

(my emphasis)

EMA wants BE to be demonstrated for the highest strength (under certain conditions BE-studies of lower strengths can be waived).
  • In a cross-over study the concentration influenced by bodyweight is irrelevant (the comparison is done within subjects).
  • In a parallel design you should try to keep the average bodyweights of groups as close as possible.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
BarbaraM
☆    

Greece,
2014-08-07 18:31
(4337 d 13:54 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 13350
Views: 9,668
 

 Definition of BE (EMA)

Hi! thank you both for the quick feedback and the Greek salut :-).

Indeed I'm referring to a standard 2-way cross over BE. My concern rises from the fact that if we dose 1 tab of 1000 mg (highest strength) then depending on the subject's body weight this will result in doses much less than the 25 mg/kg that is specified in the SmPC (e.g. for the 60 kg subject would result in ~17 mg/kg) and I assume that this will result in a Cmax and AUC less than the SmPC proposes.
It would be as if we had 2 strength of a product and we were to dose the smallest strength, instead of the highest as the EMA guideline proposes to be the most discriminatory case.

What do you think? Does this make any sense?
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2014-08-07 19:42
(4337 d 12:43 ago)

@ BarbaraM
Posting: # 13351
Views: 9,544
 

 Dosing low or as per 4.2

Hi BarbaraM,

❝ Indeed I'm referring to a standard 2-way cross over BE. My concern rises from the fact that if we dose 1 tab of 1000 mg (highest strength) then depending on the subject's body weight this will result in doses much less than the 25 mg/kg that is specified in the SmPC (e.g. for the 60 kg subject would result in ~17 mg/kg) and I assume that this will result in a Cmax and AUC less than the SmPC proposes.


Note that dosing per SPC is not a goal in itself (at least not for EU submissions).

❝ It would be as if we had 2 strength of a product and we were to dose the smallest strength, instead of the highest as the EMA guideline proposes to be the most discriminatory case.


❝ What do you think? Does this make any sense?


Could be succesful. At least the low strenght will be approvable if the study turns out equivalent. If you can argue less-than-proportional kinetics or a safety concern then you may have an additional good argument.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Dr_Dan
★★  

Germany,
2014-08-11 02:10
(4334 d 06:15 ago)

@ BarbaraM
Posting: # 13360
Views: 9,448
 

 Definition of BE (EMA)

Dear BarbaraM
First of all one question: Do you need to dose patients? I guess this is the case, right? Bad luck.... You can not mix two strenghts (500 mg and 1000 mg = two formulations) for the assessment of bioequivalence. I would go for a scientific advice proposing the execution of the study with the lower strength.
Kind regards
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2014-08-11 13:02
(4333 d 19:23 ago)

@ Dr_Dan
Posting: # 13362
Views: 9,474
 

 Patients or healthy subjects?

Dear Dr Dan,

❝ First of all one question: Do you need to dose patients? I guess this is the case, right?


I don’t think so since Barabara wrote in her original post:

❝ ❝ A drug […] is to be dosed in real life by calculating the dose per kg body weight […].

❝ ❝ how should the healthy subjects be dosed in a BE study?


@Barbara: Can you clarify please?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
luvblooms
★★  

India,
2014-08-11 08:56
(4333 d 23:29 ago)

@ BarbaraM
Posting: # 13361
Views: 9,412
 

 administered dose for drugs dosed per kg body weight

Dear Barbara


❝ how should the healthy subjects be dosed in a BE study? should they be dosed by taking into account their body weight (as above) or regardless of their body weight take the 1000 mg tab?


You can Check the EMA BE requirment for Capecitabine.

For Capectiabine Standard and reduced dose calculations according to body surface area for starting doses of capecitabine of 1250mg/m2 and 1000mg/m2, respectively but for BE study Strength to be used is 500 mg because it is the highest strength.

Hope this will help.

~A happy Soul~
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2014-08-11 13:14
(4333 d 19:11 ago)

@ luvblooms
Posting: # 13363
Views: 9,415
 

 administered dose for drugs dosed per kg body weight

Hi Luv,

❝ You can Check the EMA BE requirment for Capecitabine.


I think that EMA’s draft guidance can easily be misinterpreted (see my remarks at the end of this post). Maybe the guidance’s wording is just ambiguous. The 500 mg strength is OK, but should not be interpreted as the suitable dose – which should still be calculated according to the common poso­logy.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
luvblooms
★★  

India,
2014-08-12 08:28
(4332 d 23:57 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 13364
Views: 9,377
 

 administered dose for drugs dosed per kg body weight

Hi Helmut


❝ I think that EMA’s draft guidance can easily be misinterpreted (see my remarks at the end of this post). Maybe the guidance’s wording is just ambiguous. The 500 mg strength is OK, but should not be interpreted as the suitable dose – which should still be calculated according to the common poso­logy.


Totally agreed to the point raised by you. Also the study has to be done in patients thus using just 500 mg (where as the dose based on BSA lies in 1500-2500 mg) is also not ethically right. We have already asked for clarification on the same from EMEA. Lets see if we can get a reply.

IF the study has to be done on healthy volunteers (after regulatory consultation) using 500 mg should be ok.
Remember Imatinib guidance

~A happy Soul~
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2014-08-12 14:23
(4332 d 18:02 ago)

@ luvblooms
Posting: # 13369
Views: 9,370
 

 Patients or healthy subjects…

Hi Luv,

❝ […] the study has to be done in patients thus using just 500 mg (where as the dose based on BSA lies in 1500-2500 mg) is also not ethically right. We have already asked for clarification on the same from EMEA. Lets see if we can get a reply.


Did you also send a comment on the draft guidance to the EMA (as I did)?

IF the study has to be done on healthy volunteers (after regulatory consultation) using 500 mg should be ok.


Yes.

❝ Remember Imatinib guidance


I do. ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
142 visitors (1 registered, 141 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5