jag009
★★★

NJ,
2012-07-25 18:40
(5087 d 21:16 ago)

Posting: # 8979
Views: 4,564
 

 FDA on Truncated AUC [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Hi guys,

Question.. Can I use truncated AUC if the drug has an average half-life of 25-30 hours? The upper range can be as high as 60 hours but my 6 subjects in a pilot all have t1/2 no greater than 27 hours. If I go without truncated AUC then i will probably have to sample out to 120-144 hours. The AUCt/AUCinf ratio on average (n=6) is 90%.

Thanks

John
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2012-07-25 19:01
(5087 d 20:54 ago)

@ jag009
Posting: # 8980
Views: 3,918
 

 FDA on Truncated AUC

Hi John!

❝ Can I use truncated AUC if the drug has an average half-life of 25-30 hours? The upper range can be as high as 60 hours but my 6 subjects in a pilot all have t1/2 no greater than 27 hours. If I go without truncated AUC then i will probably have to sample out to 120-144 hours. The AUCt/AUCinf ratio on average (n=6) is 90%.


FDA does not specify what a “long half-life” is. In my experience everything on the average (!) ≥24 hours is OK. The end of [image] the respective section is a little bit strange:

For drugs that demonstrate low intrasubject variability in distribution and clearance, an AUC truncated at 72 hours (AUC0-72 hr) can be used in place of AUC0-t or AUC0-∞. For drugs demonstrating high intrasubject variability in distribution and clearance, AUC truncation warrants caution. In such cases, we also recommend that sponsors and/or applicants consult the appropriate review staff.

(my emphases)
Canada and EMA don’t make a distinction between low/high variability. Personally I don’t get FDA’s point.

Side note: Canada does not specify in their current guidance what a “long half-life” is as well (was 24 hours in their 2005 guidance). In Europe you may use AUC72 irrespective of the half-life.

PS: Pleeeze, no more multiple blanks in your posts! Or are you using a typewriter, scanning the text, sending it through OCR and pasting it in here?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
jag009
★★★

NJ,
2012-07-25 19:19
(5087 d 20:37 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 8981
Views: 3,909
 

 FDA on Truncated AUC

Hi Helmut,

Thanks for the information. The part I am not comfortable about is when FDA stated that "For drugs demonstrating high intrasubject variability in distribution and clearance, AUC truncation warrants caution." Are they referring to highly variable drugs?

Thanks

John

PS. Regarding the multiple blanks in my previous post.... You don't see it now right?
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2012-07-25 19:28
(5087 d 20:28 ago)

@ jag009
Posting: # 8982
Views: 3,845
 

 FDA on Truncated AUC

Hi John,

❝ The part I am not comfortable about is when FDA stated that "For drugs demonstrating high intrasubject variability in distribution and clearance, AUC truncation warrants caution." Are they referring to highly variable drugs?


I guess (!!) so.

❝ PS. Regarding the multiple blanks in my previous post.... You don't see it now right?


… because I deleted them in all your previous posts (and this one as well).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
209 visitors (0 registered, 209 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5