|
jag009 ★★★ NJ, 2012-07-25 18:40 (5087 d 21:16 ago) Posting: # 8979 Views: 4,564 |
|
|
Hi guys, Question.. Can I use truncated AUC if the drug has an average half-life of 25-30 hours? The upper range can be as high as 60 hours but my 6 subjects in a pilot all have t1/2 no greater than 27 hours. If I go without truncated AUC then i will probably have to sample out to 120-144 hours. The AUCt/AUCinf ratio on average (n=6) is 90%. Thanks John |
|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2012-07-25 19:01 (5087 d 20:54 ago) @ jag009 Posting: # 8980 Views: 3,918 |
|
|
Hi John! ❝ Can I use truncated AUC if the drug has an average half-life of 25-30 hours? The upper range can be as high as 60 hours but my 6 subjects in a pilot all have t1/2 no greater than 27 hours. If I go without truncated AUC then i will probably have to sample out to 120-144 hours. The AUCt/AUCinf ratio on average (n=6) is 90%. FDA does not specify what a “long half-life” is. In my experience everything on the average (!) ≥24 hours is OK. The end of the respective section is a little bit strange:For drugs that demonstrate low intrasubject variability in distribution and clearance, an AUC truncated at 72 hours (AUC0-72 hr) can be used in place of AUC0-t or AUC0-∞. For drugs demonstrating high intrasubject variability in distribution and clearance, AUC truncation warrants caution. In such cases, we also recommend that sponsors and/or applicants consult the appropriate review staff. (my emphases)Canada and EMA don’t make a distinction between low/high variability. Personally I don’t get FDA’s point. Side note: Canada does not specify in their current guidance what a “long half-life” is as well (was 24 hours in their 2005 guidance). In Europe you may use AUC72 irrespective of the half-life. PS: Pleeeze, no more multiple blanks in your posts! Or are you using a typewriter, scanning the text, sending it through OCR and pasting it in here? — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |
|
jag009 ★★★ NJ, 2012-07-25 19:19 (5087 d 20:37 ago) @ Helmut Posting: # 8981 Views: 3,909 |
|
|
Hi Helmut, Thanks for the information. The part I am not comfortable about is when FDA stated that "For drugs demonstrating high intrasubject variability in distribution and clearance, AUC truncation warrants caution." Are they referring to highly variable drugs? Thanks John PS. Regarding the multiple blanks in my previous post.... You don't see it now right? |
|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2012-07-25 19:28 (5087 d 20:28 ago) @ jag009 Posting: # 8982 Views: 3,845 |
|
|
Hi John, ❝ The part I am not comfortable about is when FDA stated that "For drugs demonstrating high intrasubject variability in distribution and clearance, AUC truncation warrants caution." Are they referring to highly variable drugs? I guess (!!) so. ❝ PS. Regarding the multiple blanks in my previous post.... You don't see it now right? … because I deleted them in all your previous posts (and this one as well). — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |

the respective section![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
