jag009
★★★

NJ,
2012-04-18 19:26
(5184 d 10:27 ago)

Posting: # 8445
Views: 5,112
 

 History Lesson: FDA BA/BE guidance [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Hi everyone,

Can someone give me a history lesson on the differences between the old and new FDA requirement on BE studies with respect to the fed study?

Correct me if I am wrong... The previous requirement was a 3-way (Test Fast, Test Fed, Reference Fed) with Cmax based on T/R ratios AUCs based on 90% CI?

Thanks

John
jag009
★★★

NJ,
2012-04-19 21:39
(5183 d 08:14 ago)

@ jag009
Posting: # 8448
Views: 4,496
 

 History Lesson: FDA BA/BE guidance

Sorry everyone,

I wanted to edit my question but I couldn't...

Does anyone have access to the old FDA BA/BE guidance that was issued about 199x? It was the guidance which required a SD fast study, a MD fast study and a 3-way food effect study? The food effect study BE critera was based on point estimates of Cmax and AUC to be within 80-125%?

Question... Was the guidance applicable to both immediate and extended release products?

Thanks

john
drgunasakaran1
★★  
avatar

2012-05-01 15:23
(5171 d 14:30 ago)

@ jag009
Posting: # 8483
Views: 4,252
 

 History Lesson: FDA BA/BE guidance

❝ Does anyone have access to the old FDA BA/BE guidance that was issued about 199x?


Dear Mr John,

Please find below the requested old FDA Guidances

FDA Guidance 1
FDA Guidance 2

Dr Gunasakaran Sambandan MD
Disclaimer: The replies/posts are my personal opinions, and they do not represent my company's views on the same. LinkedIn
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
187 visitors (0 registered, 187 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5