Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2009-03-06 15:14
(6324 d 08:32 ago)

Posting: # 3332
Views: 5,561
 

 EMEA: new Q&A document (BA/BE/PK/...) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Dear all,

today a new Q&A document (dated 22 January 2009) was published on EMEA's website:
Questions & Answers: Positions on specific questions addressed to the EWP therapeutic subgroup on Pharmacokinetics (87KB PDF).

Topics covered are:
  1. Cocktail studies for investigating in vivo drug interaction potential
  2. Requirements for food-interaction studies for modified release formulations
  3. Bioequivalence studies for paroxetine (single dose versus multiple dose studies)
  4. Interpretation of bioequivalence data in relation to both parent and metabolite PK data
  5. Bioequivalence studies in children
  6. Bioequivalence of gastro-resistant preparations (e.g. omeprazole)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2009-07-31 15:33
(6177 d 09:13 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 3999
Views: 3,855
 

 Q&A document: update

Dear all,

yesterday an updated version of the Q&A document (dated 22 June 2009) was published on EMEA's website: Questions & Answers: Positions on specific questions addressed to the EWP therapeutic subgroup on Pharmacokinetics (89KB PDF).

A new Topic was added:

   7. Bioequivalence studies for generic products containing clopidogrel

Following questions are covered:
  1. Which substance should be studied in bioequivalence studies: the parent compound clopidogrel or the metabolite(s) of clopidogrel?
  2. Is demonstration of bioequivalence under fed conditions necessary in addition to the demonstration under fasting conditions?
  3. Bioanalytical methods: Should there be any special requirements to ensure that the risk of back-conversion of the major metabolite to clopidogrel could be excluded?
  4. Could the acceptance criteria for Cmax be widened to 75-133%?

--
Edit: Today (2009-08-04) Rev. 1 (dated 23 July 2009) was published. Nothing essential changed; some abbreviations were explained and LC-MS-MS was given only as an example analytical technique. [Helmut]

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
221 visitors (0 registered, 221 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5