|
sukimmm ● 2008-10-20 05:00 (6463 d 14:09 ago) Posting: # 2562 Views: 3,716 |
|
|
Dear all, I would like to have a kind of a brief comparison of the agencies (FDA, TPD and EMEA) in regards to bioequivalence. Something that says for example, that the BE criteria for TPD is on the Cmax, for the FDA is Cmax + CI for the Cmax, etc. (as you see I am a new statistician in this field). Did someone already draft it ? (e.g. N of subject, design of choice, BE criteria, Tmax treatment, and all other subtles differences between the agencies). This would ease my life at work. My colleagues rely on me .... Thanks to all Sukimmm |
|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2008-10-20 13:17 (6463 d 05:52 ago) @ sukimmm Posting: # 2563 Views: 3,451 |
|
|
Dear Sukimmm! ❝ I would like to have a kind of a brief comparison of the agencies [...]. ❝ Did someone already draft it ? Yes, David Dubins (Uni Toronto) did it. An excel-sheet containing comparisons is available at his site. For details please consult our Guidance collection. — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |
|
sukimmm ● 2008-10-20 19:34 (6462 d 23:35 ago) @ Helmut Posting: # 2565 Views: 2,933 |
|
|
Wonderful ! Thanks for the info. This will be more than usefull ! Sukimmm. |

![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
