praveen_mvln
☆    

India,
2025-07-03 16:10
(349 d 22:33 ago)

Posting: # 24405
Views: 3,333
 

 Bio­equi­va­lence Waiver for Lower Strengths of a BCS Class IV Drug [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Hello Everyone,

I hope this message finds all well.

I have a query regarding the possibility of waiving in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strengths of a drug classified as BCS Class IV.

The molecule in question is available in three strengths: 60 mg, 80 mg, and 100 mg. Assuming that:
– The 60 mg and 80 mg strengths are proportionally similar in formulation to the 100 mg strength, and
– The drug demonstrates linear pharmacokinetics over the relevant dose range,

Would it be acceptable to waive in vivo bioequivalence studies for the 60 mg and 80 mg strengths? Or, given the BCS Class IV designation, are BE studies still required for each individual strength?

Your guidance on this matter would be greatly appreciated

Many Thanks
Praveen Kumar


Edit: Subject line shortened. [Helmut]
dshah
★★  

India,
2025-07-07 13:07
(346 d 01:36 ago)

@ praveen_mvln
Posting: # 24407
Views: 2,654
 

 Bio­equi­va­lence Waiver for Lower Strengths of a BCS Class IV Drug

Dear Praveen!

❝ Would it be acceptable to waive in vivo bioequivalence studies for the 60 mg and 80 mg strengths? Or, given the BCS Class IV designation, are BE studies still required for each individual strength?


It will be good to evaluate it based on dissolution and not just PK linearity/dose proportionality for lower strength Biowaiver.

Divyen
praveen_mvln
☆    

India,
2025-07-11 13:26
(342 d 01:17 ago)

@ dshah
Posting: # 24412
Views: 2,584
 

 Bio­equi­va­lence Waiver for Lower Strengths of a BCS Class IV Drug

❝ Dear Divyen!



❝ It will be good to evaluate it based on dissolution and not just PK linearity/dose proportionality for lower strength Biowaiver.



We have evaluated the dissolution profiles for all strengths of the product. The lower and middle strengths demonstrated in vitro dissolution profiles comparable to that of the highest strength. In summary, the following conditions are fulfilled:
• Proportional Formulation: The lower and middle strengths are proportionally similar in composition to the highest strength, maintaining the same ratio of active and inactive ingredients.
• Consistent Manufacturing Process: All strengths are manufactured using the same process and equipment.
• Linear Pharmacokinetics: According to literature, the drug exhibits linear pharmacokinetics across the dosage range, with AUC and Cmax increasing proportionally with dose.
• Dissolution Profile Similarity: The lower strengths exhibit similar in vitro dissolution behavior to the highest strength across multiple pH conditions.

In light of the above, would appreciate your guidance on whether it would be acceptable to waive the in vivo bioequivalence studies for the 60 mg and 80 mg strengths. Alternatively, please advise if individual BE studies are still required for each strength
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
170 visitors (0 registered, 170 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5