kumarnaidu
★    

Mumbai, India,
2019-02-05 16:32
(2700 d 17:06 ago)

Posting: # 19869
Views: 3,251
 

 In-vitro Population Bioequivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Hi,

We have questions on In-vitro Population BE study.

The approach used was the proc GLM for calculation MSW_R, MSW_T, MSB_R and MSB_R for parameters of D50 and Span to population bioequivalence.

We use standard algorithm for one life stage (m=1) as defined in draft budesonide guideline recommend sept 2012.

Now problem is our results does not matches with the sponsor results, when we calculated SD_R and SD_T for one life stage (m=1) from Proc GLM model.

There are large differences for the values of SD_R, SD_T and 95% upper confidence bound for linearized criteria of reference-scaled and constant scaled my approach, but the Geometric mean are very similar for both D50 and Span.

They have used the proc mean procedure and directly extracted SD_T and SD_R value and used all remaining calculation.

As mentioned in draft budesonide guideline, for data collected on one life stage (m=1), ignore E2, E4c and E4s and their corresponding H and U terms in the calculation.

Calculation formula for sigmaR and sigmaT (for more than one life stage (m>1)) are as below:

data FinalRef;           
merge both (where=(TRT='R' and _SOURCE_='ERROR') rename=(Mean=Mean_R MS=MSW_R))
      both (where=(TRT='R' and _SOURCE_='Container') rename=(MS=MSB_R));
    by _name_;
run;
data FinalTest;             
merge both (where=(TRT='T' and _SOURCE_='ERROR') rename=(Mean=Mean_T MS=MSW_T))
      both (where=(TRT='T' and _SOURCE_='Container') rename=(MS=MSB_T));
    by _name_;
run;
m_T=1;/* no. of stages-to modify*/
m_R=1;/* no. of stages-to modify*/
n_T=10;/* no. of bottles per batch-to modify*/
n_R=10;/* no. of bottles per batch-to modify*/
l_T=4;/* no. of batches-to modify*/
l_R=4;/* no. of batches-to modify*/
GM_Ratio=exp(mean_T)/exp(mean_R);
SD_R=sqrt ((MSB_R/m_R)+(((m_R-1)*MSW_R)/m_R));
SD_T=sqrt ((MSB_T/m_T)+(((m_T-1)*MSW_T)/m_T));
HD=(abs(meandiff)+tval*sqrt((MSB_T/(n_T*l_T*m_T))+(MSB_R/(n_R*l_R*m_R))))**2;
UD=(HD-ED)**2;
E1=MSB_T/m_T;
H1=(l_T*n_T-1)*E1/(cinv(&alpha,(l_T*n_T-1)));
U1=(H1-E1)**2;
E3s=-(1+&thetap)*MSB_R/m_R;
H3s=((l_R*n_R-1)*E3s)/(cinv((1-&alpha),(l_R*n_R-1)));
U3S=(H3s-E3s)**2;
E3c=-MSB_R/m_R;
H3c=(l_R*n_R-1)*E3c/(cinv((1-&alpha),(l_R*n_R-1)));
U3c=(H3c-E3c)**2;
Eqr=ED+E1+E3s;
Hn1=Eqr+sqrt(UD+U1+U3s);
Eqc=(ED+E1+E3c-&thetaP*&Sigma2T0);
Hn2=Eqc+sqrt(UD+U1+U3c);


We did not found the algorithm with sigmaR and sigmaT calculation for one life stage (m=1). We have slightly modified SD_R and SD_T formula for one life stage (m=1) and remove (((m_R-1)*MSW_R)/m_R)) and (((m_T-1)*MSW_T)/m_T)) from above equation.


Modified equation are as below:
SD_R=sqrt (MSB_R/m_R)
SD_T=sqrt (MSB_T/m_T)


Here we are confuse with approach which is based on the draft guideline.

Can anybody comment of formula on SD_R and SD_T calculation for one life stage (m=1)?

https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/.../Guidances/UCM319977.pdf

Kumar Naidu
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
242 visitors (0 registered, 242 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5