ioanam
★    

Romania,
2008-04-22 10:50
(6644 d 10:39 ago)

Posting: # 1785
Views: 3,828
 

 Extended vs. immediate release [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Dear all,

I would like to know if a bioequivalence study between an extended release formulation (considered generic) and the immediate release formulation containing the same active substance (as innovator) is enough for submission in the EU countries.

Best regards,
Ioana M.
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2008-04-22 15:12
(6644 d 06:17 ago)

@ ioanam
Posting: # 1788
Views: 3,498
 

 ER vs. IR

Dear Ioana!

❝ […] a bioequivalence study between an extended release formulation (considered generic) and the immediate release formulation containing the same active substance (as innovator) …


That’s not a bioequivalence study, because at least the rate of BA is expected to be different.
For the design please see the EU guideline (Appendix 1).

❝ … is enough for submission in the EU countries.


No. At least one (most likely two) controlled clinical study/studies on safety/efficacy are necessary as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
357 visitors (0 registered, 357 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5