Samaya B
☆    

India,
2014-06-28 09:18
(4383 d 18:52 ago)

Posting: # 13162
Views: 5,404
 

 Fampyra 10 mg prolonged-release tablets NTI [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Dear All,

Good morning!!

As per Summary of Product Charactristics (SPC), Fampyra 10 mg prolonged-release tablets is a narrow therapeutic Index drug. http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/25003/SPC/Fampyra+10+mg+prolonged-release+tablets/#PHARMACOKINETIC_PROPS

USFDA dose not consider Dalfampridine Extended Release Tablets 10 mg as a NTI.

Do we have to follow 90.00 - 111.11% CI limit for AUC in case of EU submission??

Kindly advice.

Thanks.


Regards,
Samaya.
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2014-06-28 13:16
(4383 d 14:55 ago)

@ Samaya B
Posting: # 13164
Views: 4,476
 

 Fampyra 10 mg prolonged-release tablets NTI

Hello Samaya B,

❝ Do we have to follow 90.00 - 111.11% CI limit for AUC in case of EU submission??


That is a very good question.

One one hand, the SPC says it is an NTI drug and the guideline says: "In specific cases of products with a narrow therapeutic index, the acceptance interval for AUC should be tightened to 90.00-111.11%."

On the other hand, the innovator used a BE study with conventional limits in the development of Fampyra, and this was accepted by regulators. See page 23 og the assessment report here.

What's the verdict then? If you have ample time get a scientific advice and use the above info to argue that 80.00%-125.00% should apply in your study. Then do what you are told. Otherwise, play it safe and use 90.00% to 111.11%.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Samaya B
☆    

India,
2014-06-30 08:50
(4381 d 19:20 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 13167
Views: 4,483
 

 Fampyra 10 mg prolonged-release tablets NTI

Dear ElMaestro,

Thank you so much for the responce.

We will go ahead to get scientific advice from EMEA.

Regards,
Samaya.
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
394 visitors (0 registered, 394 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5