Dr Naghma Hashmi
☆    

Pakistan,
2014-02-27 11:39
(4501 d 15:00 ago)

Posting: # 12524
Views: 2,829
 

 Justification for reanalysis [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Guideline on bioanalytical method validation European Medicines Agency, 2011
stated "For bioequivalence studies, normally reanalysis of study samples because of a pharmacokinetic reason is not acceptable, as this may affect and bias the outcome of such a study. In this case, reanalysis might be considered as part of laboratory investigations, to identify possible reasons for results considered as abnormal and to prevent the recurrence of similar problems in the future.
In case of reanalysis because of positive pre-dose samples or because of a pharmacokinetic reason,the reanalysed samples should be identified and the initial value, the reason for reanalysis, the values obtained in the reanalyses, the finally accepted value and a justification for the acceptance should be provided."

In the light of this statement whether reanalysis on the basis of pharmacokinetic reason is acceptable? what would be the possible justification for accepting the reanalyzed (new) value?

Regards

Dr. N. Hashmi
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2014-02-27 12:33
(4501 d 14:06 ago)

@ Dr Naghma Hashmi
Posting: # 12525
Views: 2,400
 

 Justification for reanalysis

Dear N. Hashmi,

❝ In the light of this statement whether reanalysis on the basis of pharmacokinetic reason is acceptable?


For an EU submission: no.

❝ what would be the possible justification for accepting the reanalyzed (new) value?


Unfortunately none, even if you re-analyse samples to identify the root cause for the abnormal value, find that the analyst messed-up something and the initial value is inaccurate. The EU assessors just don't wan't to hear of PK repeats.

Regards
Ohlbe
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
153 visitors (0 registered, 153 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge.    Charles Darwin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5