alagu
☆    

India,
2013-08-20 15:00
(4690 d 17:23 ago)

Posting: # 11316
Views: 4,151
 

 Plasma sample storage as per regulatory per­spective? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

After finishing bio-analysis for Pivotal BE study Aliquot 2 storage time period required for USA & EUROPE market?
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2013-08-20 15:51
(4690 d 16:32 ago)

@ alagu
Posting: # 11319
Views: 3,613
 

 Plasma sample storage as per regulatory per­spective?

Dear Alagu,

First please read the Forum policy, particularly under 'search' and 'be polite'.

❝ After finishing bio-analysis for Pivotal BE study Aliquot 2 storage time period required for USA & EUROPE market?


Europe: nothing mentioned in any guideline. There is no requirement to keep the samples for any period of time after the end of the trial. It would make no sense to keep the samples if you don't have long-term stability data to support their use anyway.

US: AFAIK, no requirement either.

Some sponsors require the lab to keep the samples until the product gets approved, in case they get a query from regulatory agencies e.g. to analyse a metabolite in addition to the parent, etc.

Regards
Ohlbe
jag009
★★★

NJ,
2013-08-20 20:10
(4690 d 12:12 ago)

@ Ohlbe
Posting: # 11324
Views: 3,585
 

 Plasma sample storage as per regulatory perspective?

Hi Ohlbe,

Also depending on the long term stability, no?

John
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2013-08-20 21:16
(4690 d 11:07 ago)

@ jag009
Posting: # 11328
Views: 3,598
 

 Plasma sample storage as per regulatory perspective?

Hi John,

Yes, that's what I wrote in my post: it makes little sense to keep the samples if you don't have the long-term stability data to back this up.

A solution could be to also keep QC samples along with the study samples, to be able to check the long-term stability in case you need some re-analysis. But this won't help if you have to re-analyse the samples for another analyte such as a metabolite.

Most CROs charge for sample storage after 3 to 6 months, which usually makes sponsors reconsider their "just-in-case" attitude :-D

Regards
Ohlbe
jag009
★★★

NJ,
2013-08-20 21:51
(4690 d 10:32 ago)

@ Ohlbe
Posting: # 11329
Views: 3,607
 

 Plasma sample storage as per regu­latory perspective?

Thanks Ohlbe,

❝ A solution could be to also keep QC samples along with the study samples, to be able to check the long-term stability in case you need some re-analysis. But this won't help if you have to re-analyse the samples for another analyte such as a metabolite.


I have a question. If somewhere down the road someone wants to analyze the samples beyond long term stability, is it possible? For research purposes, not regulatory. It is doable to extend the long term stability right?

Thanks
John
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2013-08-21 12:07
(4689 d 20:15 ago)

@ jag009
Posting: # 11331
Views: 3,522
 

 Plasma sample storage as per regu­latory perspective?

Hi John,

❝ I have a question. If somewhere down the road someone wants to analyze the samples beyond long term stability, is it possible? For research purposes, not regulatory. It is doable to extend the long term stability right?


Sure, it is. It just takes time, that's all :-D
If you still have old QC samples, that's quite easy. If you don't: well, you'll have to prepare stability samples, analyse your study samples, and wait for your stability samples to become old enough...

If you still aim for the same analyte, and if it's only for research purposes, you can also just compare the new results to the old ones. If you still find the same result, the samples were (probably) stable. If the result is systematically lower, either the analyte was not stable, or you screwed up somewhere. If the result is systematically higher, either an unstable metabolite got back-converted, or you screwed up somewhere :-D

If you go for a new analyte (metabolite, etc.), first check what information was given to the subjects in the informed consent form. You may have to re-consent them first !

Regards
Ohlbe
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
123 visitors (0 registered, 123 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5