luvblooms
★★  

India,
2013-08-20 09:01
(4691 d 08:06 ago)

(edited on 2013-08-20 10:20)
Posting: # 11309
Views: 3,599
 

 EMEA perspective: Cmax less than 5% for Test Product [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Dear All

Good morning :flower:

A few days back, have done a pilot BE study for a combination product of BCS class I (tmax range: 6-12 hrs) and II molecule (Tmax: 2-4 hrs).

After plasma sample analysis we have observed that a certain volunteer showed no measurable plasma conc. for both the components of the combination product following administration of the TEST formulation in Period II

The plasma profile shows that
  1. Plasma concentration of molecule I is zero (All values below LLOQ)
  2. concentration of molecule II is 1 % of the geomean (of reference and test)
It clearly indicates that the volunteer has splitted the tablet out after administration and as usual CRO came with a justification that There are no clinical or bio-analytical anomalies associated

Luckily this was a pilot BE study and the results excluding the volunteer was very nice (Mean T/R ratios 98-102 and CI limits 88-115) but data including volunteer for molecule II is disastrous (T/R=80% CI- 44-133 with ISCV 100%)

This gives us another lesson about the importance of the BE study monitoring and we would be more cautious for the Pivotal BE study.

As per EMEA, Exclusion of data cannot be accepted on the basis of statistical analysis or for pharmacokinetic reasons alone, because it is impossible to distinguish the formulation effects from other effects influencing the pharmacokinetics. The exceptions to this are: A subject with lack of any measurable concentrations or only very low plasma concentrations for reference medicinal product. A subject is considered to have very low plasma concentrations if its AUC is less than 5% of reference medicinal product geometric mean AUC (which should be calculated without inclusion of data from the outlying subject). The exclusion of data due to this reason will only be accepted in exceptional cases and ay question the validity of the trial.

Now coming to the queries
  1. What to do if we ran in the same situation again in Pivotal study (Zero concentration or AUC <5% for test product)? EMEA agrees for removing volunteers which show lack of any measurable concentrations or only very low plasma concentrations for reference medicinal product only. What about test product data?
  2. What could be the other reasons of getting zero concentration?

~A happy Soul~
d_labes
★★★

Berlin, Germany,
2013-08-20 10:28
(4691 d 06:39 ago)

@ luvblooms
Posting: # 11310
Views: 2,848
 

 EMA perspective: Cmax less than 5% for Test Product

Dear Luvblooms,

for your question a) see Ohlbe's post.

Regards,

Detlew
luvblooms
★★  

India,
2013-08-20 12:22
(4691 d 04:45 ago)

@ d_labes
Posting: # 11314
Views: 2,797
 

 EMA perspective: Cmax less than 5% for Test Product

Dear Detlew

Thanks a lot for pointing out.
I totally missed it because of using different keyword search.

~A happy Soul~
Dr_Dan
★★  

Germany,
2013-08-20 16:21
(4691 d 00:47 ago)

@ d_labes
Posting: # 11321
Views: 2,820
 

 EMA perspective: Cmax less than 5% for Test Product

Dear all
A BCS class I substance is characterized by very good solubility and very high bioavailability. So if you have no plasma concentrations you can be pretty shure that the subject did not take the drug. In this case I think it could be possible to argue with the regulatory authority and maybe your assessor is willing to follow your argumentation. It is a chance.
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
126 visitors (0 registered, 126 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5