|
vivekanand ☆ India, 2013-05-25 08:39 (4778 d 11:33 ago) Posting: # 10654 Views: 2,429 |
|
|
Dear All As per IEC approved protocol if their is any chane in statistical investigator the cahnge can be approved through IEC by raising Amendment to protocol. Where as if the statistcal investigator whose name was initially mentioned in protocol conducted the statistical analysis for the sudy, irespective of IEC approved amendment. Then what stand should be taken if any queiry raised from regulatory Regards G.Balavivekanand |
|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2013-05-25 14:40 (4778 d 05:31 ago) @ vivekanand Posting: # 10655 Views: 1,996 |
|
|
Dear Vivekanand, first of all please read – and follow – this post. Are you on the run? Why are you forcing us to read your posts full of typographical errors? I would suggest that you do your homework first. Talk to colleagues and rely on your own judgment before trying to drown forum’s members in posts of interrelated content. See also the sentence in my signature below. Select an appropriate category for your post. If you really believe that everything is regulated (since you always posted in Regulatives / Guidelines]) I’m afraid you are on the wrong track. Concerning your questions: Such a change is irrelevant. Why do you think that the IEC or regulators will have concerns if person B instead of person A evaluates the study with the same methods specified in the protocol?
— Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |

![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
