A-M-R
☆    

Egypt,
2009-05-24 15:47
(6245 d 05:24 ago)

Posting: # 3742
Views: 6,105
 

 failed bioequivalence study [Study As­sess­ment]

HELP

have carried out bioequivalence study on sustained release formulation and the results between the test and reference drug were not satisfied as the geometric mean ratio for main pK parameters was less than 80% and the confidence interval for the three pharmacokinetic parameters fall outside the lower limit but it is within limit for the upper confidence limit
0.8 [>] CI [<] 1.25 , can you give me your opinion about these results and is these two drugs is totaly different or there is a possibility of sucess for this study and how.

very thanks
Amr hussein


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2009-05-24 16:48
(6245 d 04:23 ago)

@ A-M-R
Posting: # 3743
Views: 4,911
 

 failed bioequivalence study

Hi AMR,

❝ the geometric mean ratio for main pK parameters was less than 80%


It sounds to me like the formulations are not really equivalent, so reformulation is imho the way forward.

Best regards
EM.
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
271 visitors (0 registered, 271 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5