A-M-R
☆    

Egypt,
2009-05-24 15:47
(5829 d 20:06 ago)

Posting: # 3742
Views: 4,802
 

 failed bioequivalence study [Study As­sess­ment]

HELP

have carried out bioequivalence study on sustained release formulation and the results between the test and reference drug were not satisfied as the geometric mean ratio for main pK parameters was less than 80% and the confidence interval for the three pharmacokinetic parameters fall outside the lower limit but it is within limit for the upper confidence limit
0.8 [>] CI [<] 1.25 , can you give me your opinion about these results and is these two drugs is totaly different or there is a possibility of sucess for this study and how.

very thanks
Amr hussein


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2009-05-24 16:48
(5829 d 19:05 ago)

@ A-M-R
Posting: # 3743
Views: 3,867
 

 failed bioequivalence study

Hi AMR,

❝ the geometric mean ratio for main pK parameters was less than 80%


It sounds to me like the formulations are not really equivalent, so reformulation is imho the way forward.

Best regards
EM.
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
128 visitors (0 registered, 128 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We should not speak so that it is possible
for the audience to understand us,
but so that it is impossible
for them to misunderstand us.    Quintilian

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5