|
Amira ☆ Egypt, 2017-09-26 14:26 (3189 d 03:45 ago) Posting: # 17829 Views: 8,912 |
|
|
Hello, Atorvastatin Calcium is known as highly variable drug but when we conducted a BE study on it, the results gave low intra-subject Variability (18%) and that's inconsistent with the usual results. What could be the reason/s for this? Thank you. Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. [Helmut] |
|
ElMaestro ★★★ Denmark, 2017-09-26 14:51 (3189 d 03:19 ago) @ Amira Posting: # 17830 Views: 6,850 |
|
|
Hi Amira, Chance? Better assay? Design differences? Lesser within-batch variability (-ies) than in the studies you compare to? — Pass or fail! ElMaestro |
|
nobody nothing 2017-09-27 12:11 (3188 d 06:00 ago) @ ElMaestro Posting: # 17832 Views: 6,800 |
|
|
❝ Chance? ❝ Better assay? ❝ Design differences? ❝ Lesser within-batch variability (-ies) than in the studies you compare to? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22167570 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21548957 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20818835 — Kindest regards, nobody |
|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2017-09-27 13:05 (3188 d 05:05 ago) @ nobody Posting: # 17833 Views: 6,828 |
|
|
Hi ElMaestro & nobody, ❝ ❝ Chance? ❝ Maybe, but... Quick calculations based on published CV (~35%), full replicate designs (n 40–64): Very, very unlikely; p <10–16. — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |

![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
