rana
☆    

India,
2012-11-23 15:49
(4544 d 17:08 ago)

Posting: # 9575
Views: 19,352
 

 Difference between Cminss and Ctrough [NCA / SHAM]

Can any one differenciate me the difference between Cminss and Ctrough in steady state (multiple dose) studies in bioequivalence studies.
Another Query is how can we calculate Ctrough?
Regards
Rana.


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]
drgunasakaran1
★★  
avatar

2012-11-23 16:10
(4544 d 16:47 ago)

@ rana
Posting: # 9576
Views: 18,196
 

 Difference between Cminss and Ctrough

Dear Mr Rana,

Kindly follow forum policy, see here

Cmin,ss: Minimum steady-state plasma drug concentration during a dosage interval

Ctrough: Trough plasma concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval at steady state [taken directly before next administration])

Dr Gunasakaran Sambandan MD
Disclaimer: The replies/posts are my personal opinions, and they do not represent my company's views on the same. LinkedIn
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2012-11-23 16:15
(4544 d 16:42 ago)

@ rana
Posting: # 9577
Views: 18,192
 

 EMA’s odd terminology…

Dear Rana,

please [image] search the forum in the future.

It’s a matter of terminology. Commonly1,2 Ctrough is defined as the concentration at the end of the dosage interval τ and Cmin,ss as the (global) minimum within τ. FDA3 defines Cmin as the concentration at τ. EMA4 wants to see Cmin,ss, but quotes the definition of Ctrough (“By Cmin,ss we mean the concentration at the end of the dosage interval, i.e. [sic] Ctrough).* :-D
Pharsight’s Phoenix/WinNonlin reports the global minimum. For the FDA and EMA you have to either use Clast instead or – if you are courageous – consider using an estimate (if there are time deviations from τ or missing samples and you have a suitable estimate of λz). For details see the previous posts or this presentation (slides 34-39).


  1. HJ Weimann
    Drug concentrations and directly derived parameters
    In: W Cawello (Ed.), Parameters for Compartment-Free Pharmacokinetics
    Shaker-Verlag, Aachen pp 31–4 (2003)
  2. AGAH working group PHARMACOKINETICS
    Collection of terms, symbols, equations, and explanations of common pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters and some statistical functions
    Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Angewandte Humanpharmakologie (AGAH), 2004
  3. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
    [image] Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products—General Considerations
    Rockville, March 2003
  4. European Medicines Agency
    Overviews of Comments received on Draft Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence
    Doc. Ref. EMA/CHMP/EWP/26817/2010
    London, 20 January 2010

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
61 visitors (0 registered, 61 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5