lukamar ☆ Poland, 2009-03-03 13:02 (5904 d 22:23 ago) Posting: # 3308 Views: 3,909 |
|
Hi all, Does anyone know if there are any specific guidelines about calculation of elimination constant rate? Specifically, is there any limit of correlation coefficient below which calculation of Kel should not be perfomed? Or is including all time points from elimination phase (e.g. 13 i.e. all after Tmax) to get correlation coefficient as close to 1 as possible acceptable? Thanks in advance for help. Best regards, Łukasz |
Helmut ★★★ ![]() ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2009-03-03 15:08 (5904 d 20:17 ago) @ lukamar Posting: # 3309 Views: 3,374 |
|
Dear Łukasz! ❝ Does anyone know if there are any specific guidelines about calculation of elimination constant rate? No specific text I know of – just ambigous wording like ‘a reliable estimate, ![]() ❝ Specifically, is there any limit of correlation coefficient below which calculation of Kel should not be perfomed? The correlation coefficient is a strange thing… See this rather lengthy thread. All methods discussed there are available in the package bear for R (see here). ❝ Or is including all time points from elimination phase (e.g. 13 i.e. all after Tmax) to get correlation coefficient as close to 1 as possible acceptable? I don’t think this makes sense. We want to get a reliable estimate of the elimination, not a correlation coefficient as close to 1 as possible. It’s evident that the closer you get to tmax, the more influentual the – still existing – absorption phase will be. But that’s another cup of tea. ![]() — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |