arl_stat
★    

India,
2016-03-02 11:13
(3349 d 01:01 ago)

Posting: # 16042
Views: 6,631
 

 0.00 concentration value between two measurable concentrations [NCA / SHAM]

Post reply
Hello Forum Members,

In a data, we received 0.00 concentration value between two measurable concentrations. How to handle this?
Should we exclude the 0.00 concentration value for calculation of AUC?
Also what is the regulatory requirements.

For eg:
Subj  Conc
1     0.00
1     0.00
1     0.00
1     0.00
1     0.36
1     0.00
1     0.00
1     0.00
1     0.71
1    25.79
1    99.09
1    85.30
1    66.10
1    35.62
1    12.61
1     0.00
1     0.00
1     4.69
1     3.83
1     3.12
1     2.21
1     1.81
1     1.11
1     0.73
1     0.00
1     0.25
1     0.00
1     0.00
1     0.00

Thanks.

Edit: Category changed. Can you please post sampling times instead of the subject number? [Helmut]
 
arl_stat
★    

India,
2016-03-21 13:41
(3329 d 22:33 ago)

@ arl_stat
Posting: # 16123
Views: 5,021
 

 0.00 concentration value between two measurable concentrations

Post reply

❝ Can you please post sampling times instead of the subject number?


Hello,

Sorry for delay.
The time points are:
0.0, 2.0, 4.0, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0, 9.5, 10.0, 10.5, 11.0, 11.5, 12.0, 12.5, 13.0, 13.5, 14.0, 14.5, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72.

Thanks.

Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post!
You gave 34 time points and 29 concentrations. Were the last five “zero” as well? What was the LLOQ? [Helmut]
 
mittyri
★★  

Russia,
2016-03-21 23:17
(3329 d 12:57 ago)

@ arl_stat
Posting: # 16124
Views: 5,059
 

 “Embedded BQLs”

Post reply
Hi arl_stat,

It was discussed on the forum, I would recommend you to read these threads: BLQ values in Winnonlin, ANVISA's POV on "triangulation points", LLOQ/2 for BQLs not suggested.

In a nutshell:
  1. You should unambigously state in the Protocol how to deal with these situations.
  2. If you didn't mention it in the Protocol you should find your appropriate SOP.
  3. You have at least 3 options:
    1. Interpolate this value (linear or logarithmic depending on stated algo of AUC calculation),
    2. LLOQ/2 (may be not a best idea)
    3. Deal it as zero.
—
Kind regards,
Mittyri
 
arl_stat
★    

India,
2016-04-15 10:50
(3305 d 02:24 ago)

@ mittyri
Posting: # 16206
Views: 4,341
 

 “Embedded BQLs”

Post reply
Thank you!!!

Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Ohlbe]
 
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
182 visitors (0 registered, 182 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you tell the truth you don’t have to remember anything.    Mark Twain

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5