Log in
Register|
K2K ★ India, 2013-01-15 14:18 (4502 d 07:50 ago) Posting: # 9846 Views: 6,981 |
|
|
Dear all Whether we will get 95% upper confidence bound for reference-scaled average bioequivalence in WinNonlin software version 6.2.1? pls guide me. Edit: Subject line and category changed. [Helmut] — thanks and regards Karthik |
|
jag009 ★★★ NJ, 2013-01-15 16:16 (4502 d 05:52 ago) @ K2K Posting: # 9847 Views: 5,726 |
|
|
Nope as in no automated "press a button" routine. You need to figure it out yourself. I am using version 6.3. John |
|
Helmut ★★★   Vienna, Austria, 2013-01-15 16:51 (4502 d 05:16 ago) @ K2K Posting: # 9849 Views: 6,131 |
|
|
Dear Karthik, ❝ Whether we will get 95% upper confidence bound for reference-scaled average bioequivalence in WinNonlin software version 6.2.1? John is right. I strongly suggest to upgrade to version 6.3 for free. The setup is much, much easier and 6.2.1 contains a bug if you use ABE instead of LME; see my white papers. Above there are workflows for EMA’s models for PHX 6.2.1 and 6.3. Just compare the setups. — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png) Helmut Schütz ![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png) The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |
|
K2K ★ India, 2013-01-16 05:35 (4501 d 16:33 ago) @ Helmut Posting: # 9858 Views: 5,663 |
|
|
Dear Helmut & john, Thanks for your reply. — thanks and regards Karthik |
Ing. Helmut Schütz