Helmut ★★★ ![]() ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2012-01-03 04:27 (4880 d 17:39 ago) Posting: # 7854 Views: 11,910 |
|
Hi to all copypasters! I have mislaid the Apr 2010 draft, but in the current Feb 2011 version five lines of SAS code are missing. Well, not really missing, but printed in white on a white background. Here is the entire stuff in all its beauty (missing lines in red): Example SAS Codes: partial reference-replicated 3-way design Dataset containing TEST observations: data test; Dataset containing REFERENCE 1 observations: data ref1; Dataset containing REFERENCE 2 observations: data ref2; Determine Iij and Dij data scavbe; Intermediate analysis - ilat proc glm data=scavbe; IGLM2: pointest=exp(estimate); Intermediate analysis - dlat proc glm data=scavbe; DGLM1: dfd=df; From the above parameters, calculate the final 95% upper confidence bound: theta=((log(1.25))/0.25)**2; Example SAS Codes: fully replicated 4-way design Dataset containing TEST 1 observations: data test1; Dataset containing TEST 2 observations: data test2; Dataset containing REFERENCE 1 observations: data ref1; Dataset containing REFERENCE 2 observations: data ref2; Determine Iij and Dij data scavbe; Intermediate analysis - ilat proc mixed data=scavbe; IOUT2: pointest=exp(estimate); Intermediate analysis - dlat proc mixed data=scavbe; DOUT1: s2wr=estimate/2; DOUT2: dfd=df; From the above parameters, calculate the final 95% upper confidence bound: theta=((log(1.25))/0.25)**2; Calculation of unscaled 90% bioequivalence confidence intervals: PROC MIXED data unsc1; Enjoy! — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |
jag009 ★★★ NJ, 2013-01-14 20:47 (4503 d 01:20 ago) @ Helmut Posting: # 9837 Views: 7,179 |
|
Hi Helmut, I was just checking the 4-way full rep code. You wrote: ❝ From the above parameters, calculate the final 95% upper confidence bound: ❝ From the progesterone FDA guidance Dec 2012. I see different equation for theta: theta=((log(1.11111))/0.1)**2; Yours is wrong? Thanks John |
Helmut ★★★ ![]() ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2013-01-14 22:40 (4502 d 23:27 ago) @ jag009 Posting: # 9839 Views: 7,368 |
|
Hi John, ❝ ❝ From the above parameters, calculate the final 95% upper confidence bound: ❝ ❝ ❝ ❝ From the progesterone FDA guidance Dec 2012. I see different equation for theta: ❝ ❝ ❝ ❝ Yours is wrong? Nope. Maybe you had the warfarin-guidance also open in your reader. ![]() Yours would mean downscaling. In the Dec 2012 revision FDA corrected only the ‘visibility’ (missing lines which were formatted in white on a white background). The formula I gave is still the same (upscaling) like in previous versions. See p.6 for the partial replicate and p.8 for the full replicate. — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |